[v8-dev] Re: Issue 3870 in v8: RegExp.multiline (global) accessor should probably be deleted (or properly implemented)

2015-02-06 Thread codesite-noreply via v8-dev
Updates: Cc: a...@chromium.org erikco...@chromium.org Labels: -Area-Irregexp Comment #1 on issue 3870 by a...@chromium.org: RegExp.multiline (global) accessor should probably be deleted (or properly implemented) https://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=3870 I vote for

[v8-dev] Re: Issue 3870 in v8: RegExp.multiline (global) accessor should probably be deleted (or properly implemented)

2015-02-06 Thread codesite-noreply via v8-dev
Comment #4 on issue 3870 by caitpott...@gmail.com: RegExp.multiline (global) accessor should probably be deleted (or properly implemented) https://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=3870 Er, the implementation in V8 is compatible with JSC* =) -- You received this message because this

[v8-dev] Re: Issue 3870 in v8: RegExp.multiline (global) accessor should probably be deleted (or properly implemented)

2015-02-06 Thread codesite-noreply via v8-dev
Comment #5 on issue 3870 by a...@chromium.org: RegExp.multiline (global) accessor should probably be deleted (or properly implemented) https://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=3870 erikcorry: This bug is about removing RegExp.multiline, not the multiline property on regexp instance

[v8-dev] Re: Issue 3870 in v8: RegExp.multiline (global) accessor should probably be deleted (or properly implemented)

2015-02-06 Thread codesite-noreply via v8-dev
Comment #2 on issue 3870 by erikco...@google.com: RegExp.multiline (global) accessor should probably be deleted (or properly implemented) https://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=3870 At the moment it is compatible with Safari: re = /foo/m re.multiline // true re2 = /foo/

[v8-dev] Re: Issue 3870 in v8: RegExp.multiline (global) accessor should probably be deleted (or properly implemented)

2015-02-06 Thread codesite-noreply via v8-dev
Comment #3 on issue 3870 by caitpott...@gmail.com: RegExp.multiline (global) accessor should probably be deleted (or properly implemented) https://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=3870 This thread is about RegExp.multiline, the static accessor of the RegExp object

[v8-dev] Re: Issue 3870 in v8: RegExp.multiline (global) accessor should probably be deleted (or properly implemented)

2015-02-06 Thread codesite-noreply via v8-dev
Comment #6 on issue 3870 by brian.te...@gmail.com: RegExp.multiline (global) accessor should probably be deleted (or properly implemented) https://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=3870 Chakra doesn't implement RegExp.multiline at all so the risk of web breakage due to removing it