[v8-dev] Re: Split out libplatform into a separate libary (issue 345903004 by joc...@chromium.org)

2014-07-03 Thread jochen
https://codereview.chromium.org/345903004/diff/1/BUILD.gn File BUILD.gn (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/345903004/diff/1/BUILD.gn#newcode1067 BUILD.gn:1067: source_set("v8_libplatform") { yes, external targets can depend on this https://codereview.chromium.org/345903004/diff/1/BUILD.gn

[v8-dev] Re: Split out libplatform into a separate libary (issue 345903004 by joc...@chromium.org)

2014-07-03 Thread tfarina
https://codereview.chromium.org/345903004/diff/1/BUILD.gn File BUILD.gn (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/345903004/diff/1/BUILD.gn#newcode1067 BUILD.gn:1067: source_set("v8_libplatform") { Does this needs visibility? visibility = ":*" # Only targets in this file can depend on this. v8

[v8-dev] Re: Split out libplatform into a separate libary (issue 345903004 by joc...@chromium.org)

2014-07-03 Thread jochen
Committed patchset #1 manually as r22180 (presubmit successful). https://codereview.chromium.org/345903004/ -- -- v8-dev mailing list v8-dev@googlegroups.com http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group. To u

[v8-dev] Re: Split out libplatform into a separate libary (issue 345903004 by joc...@chromium.org)

2014-07-02 Thread jochen
https://codereview.chromium.org/345903004/diff/1/samples/process.cc File samples/process.cc (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/345903004/diff/1/samples/process.cc#newcode650 samples/process.cc:650: v8::V8::InitializePlatform(platform); On 2014/07/02 07:37:52, Jakob wrote: Is it intentiona

[v8-dev] Re: Split out libplatform into a separate libary (issue 345903004 by joc...@chromium.org)

2014-07-02 Thread jkummerow
LGTM. https://codereview.chromium.org/345903004/diff/1/samples/process.cc File samples/process.cc (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/345903004/diff/1/samples/process.cc#newcode650 samples/process.cc:650: v8::V8::InitializePlatform(platform); Is it intentional that this platform is never s