[v8-dev] Re: Use intptr_t for pointer arithmetic instead of uint32_t

2009-01-23 Thread Mads Sig Ager
I agree with Dean. We need to have an overall plan for a 64-bit port before these type changes make sense. -- Mads On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Jeff Bailey wrote: > Sure, but changing types so that things build is a first step. WIthout > being able to attach a debugger to it, I can't go t

[v8-dev] Re: Use intptr_t for pointer arithmetic instead of uint32_t

2009-01-22 Thread Jeff Bailey
Sure, but changing types so that things build is a first step. WIthout being able to attach a debugger to it, I can't go through and see what further changes need to be made. In these cases, pointers are being tossed into 32-bit ints where it looks like a reasonable change is to store them in som

[v8-dev] Re: Use intptr_t for pointer arithmetic instead of uint32_t

2009-01-22 Thread Dean McNamee
V8 is 32-bit only in a lot more ways that using intptr_t instead of uint32. Infact, they are using uint32 correctly, because the code is only going to work right on 32-bits. Someday V8 will be made 64-bit safe, but that's a much bigger effort than changing some types around... On Thu, Jan 22, 2