After digging into object construction using FunctionTemplate or
ObjectTemplate in this post:
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/v8-users/521aXb3Uer4
I believe the ObjectTemplate is missing a HasInstance() method for use in
testing arguments to JS functions to be of a certain t
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Ben Noordhuis wrote:
> That's not another option - that's the same option. :-)
>
Yeah, technically. My point was only that it could some opaque pointer,
e.g.:
static int foo = 3;
and pass a pointer to that.
But yes, having it be a string makes debuggering easi
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Ben Noordhuis wrote:
>>
>> ...The trick I mentioned in my other post is that you add a second
>> internal field that points to some atom (usually a char
>> class_name_id[] = "MyClassName") that you check for
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Ben Noordhuis wrote:
> ...The trick I mentioned in my other post is that you add a second
> internal field that points to some atom (usually a char
> class_name_id[] = "MyClassName") that you check for in your prototype
> methods so you can be sure that args.This
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Mike Moening wrote:
> Ben,
>
> Can you expand on your example?
> I'm sure this is piece of cake for you, but I'm not getting what you mean.
>
> All the samples I can find show using ObjectTemplate and the
> SetCallAsFunctionHandler() to handle construction from the
