by the way, the same restriction exists for es6-style class definitions.
On Monday, April 3, 2017 at 10:48:56 PM UTC-7, Zac Hansen wrote:
>
> I'm nearly certain you cannot -- and I don't even believe they're
> guaranteed to actually ever exist. It would put pretty serious limitations
> on
I'm nearly certain you cannot -- and I don't even believe they're
guaranteed to actually ever exist. It would put pretty serious limitations
on the optimizer if everything in a block had to exist as written.
On Monday, April 3, 2017 at 8:02:28 PM UTC-7, Ian Bull wrote:
>
> In J2V8 (our Java
In J2V8 (our Java bindings for V8 [1]) we provide access to objects defined
in the global scope.
[1] https://github.com/eclipsesource/j2v8
In Java you can write:
v8.executeScript("var foo = [1,2,3]");
V8Array array = (V8Array) v8.get("foo");
v8 in this case is the the isolate, and when we
Got some info on IRC -- apparently there is now a "code stub assembler"
that does a bunch of work on startup.
I stopped the program a few times during startup and it was confirmed,
looking at the stack traces, that that was in fact what was going on.
Moral of this story: use snapshots.
On
I just rebuilt with snapshots and verified that it is still "fast" to
startup on my code.
So my question is, what changed to make the much more convenient and
previously acceptable startup speed of the no-snapshot builds so much
slower? like.. almost 10x slower.
On Monday, April 3, 2017
Are you using the objecttemplate's setnamedpropertyhandler call? if so,
are you implementing all the callbacks to say that your CONS object doesn't
have a property a?
On Monday, April 3, 2017 at 7:25:25 AM UTC-7, Danny Dorfman wrote:
>
> Hello there,
>
> Is there a way for my interceptor to
Hello there,
Is there a way for my interceptor to know that it's running under "with",
as in this example:
var a = 10;
with (new CONS()) { do_something(a); }
The problem is, that 'a' is intercepted by the new object, and is rendered
undefined. I would like it to use the external 'a' instead.
This has been asked for numerous times and the responses that I've seen
are: "run it in a separate process" and "we take patches as long as it
doesn't slow down anything".
On Saturday, April 1, 2017 at 10:36:07 PM UTC-7, Mark Tarrabain wrote:
>
> Is it possible to get the v8 engine when using
I just updated my v8 build and noticed a dramatic slowdown in startup times.
I'd always used no snapshots for convenience because the startup penalty
was insignificant (maybe around 3s?) but ever since I updated it's up
around 20s now.
Is this a known behavior or am I doing something else
I've hooked in v8-inspector to websockets using websocketspp and have it
working pretty well initially, but I can't figure out how to make it work
if I hit refresh in chrome to have the debugger re-attach.
Most of the messages are sent through, but the one that seems to be missing
that seems
10 matches
Mail list logo
