> I don't think I can add much to
> http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev/browse_thread/thread/dba28a81d9215291/ece2b50a3b4022c
The difference would be that the object would be inside a string
instead of an opaque object. For things like HTTP upload requests,
where one needs to parse both ascii h
2009/9/9 ryan dahl :
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Erik Corry wrote:
>> What you are looking for is Blob support, which is not done:
>> http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=270
>
> It seems this would be a simpler way importing binary data into
> javascript. Is there any fundamental
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Erik Corry wrote:
> What you are looking for is Blob support, which is not done:
> http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=270
It seems this would be a simpler way importing binary data into
javascript. Is there any fundamental reason why it can't be done this
2009/9/8 ryan dahl :
> Hello -
>
> I am trying to store binary in a string by using an
> ExternalAsciiStringResource. There is a problem with values over 127.
You are breaking the contract by putting non-ASCII in an ASCII string.
There are multiple places in the code where we assume that this is
