We settled the caching of the template pattern object today. The frozen
array is cached based on the global and the strings building up the
literal. That means that two literals in different location but exactly the
same value, in the same global, will share the frozen object.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014
FWIW, IE11 developer preview does cache the call site object. It seems to
do so based on location in the source. Two identical call sites leads to
two objects. Two evals leads to same call site object.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:51 AM, 'Andreas Rossberg' via v8-users <
v8-users@googlegroups.com> wr
It is fine to move ahead as far as possible anyway, and implement
caching once the spec is resolved. We don't plan to stage or ship
before that, obviously.
/Andreas
--
--
v8-users mailing list
v8-users@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
---
You received this message becau
LGTM to implement non-tagged template literals, tagged template literals
pend spec issue resolution.
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 1:33 PM, 'Andreas Rossberg' via v8-users <
v8-users@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> On 4 November 2014 12:53, Dmitry Lomov wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Dmitry Lom
On 4 November 2014 12:53, Dmitry Lomov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Dmitry Lomov wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 11:56 AM, 'Andreas Rossberg' via v8-users
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4 November 2014 10:16, Dmitry Lomov wrote:
>>> > On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 8:43 AM, 'Andreas Rossberg' via v
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Dmitry Lomov wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 11:56 AM, 'Andreas Rossberg' via v8-users <
> v8-users@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>> On 4 November 2014 10:16, Dmitry Lomov wrote:
>> > On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 8:43 AM, 'Andreas Rossberg' via v8-users
>> > wrote:
>
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 11:56 AM, 'Andreas Rossberg' via v8-users <
v8-users@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> On 4 November 2014 10:16, Dmitry Lomov wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 8:43 AM, 'Andreas Rossberg' via v8-users
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 3 November 2014 16:58, Andreas Rossberg wrote:
> >> >
On 4 November 2014 10:16, Dmitry Lomov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 8:43 AM, 'Andreas Rossberg' via v8-users
> wrote:
>>
>> On 3 November 2014 16:58, Andreas Rossberg wrote:
>> > On 3 November 2014 16:47, Caitlin Potter wrote:
>> >> It looks like there is machinery in `Scope` for storing int
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 8:43 AM, 'Andreas Rossberg' via v8-users <
v8-users@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> On 3 November 2014 16:58, Andreas Rossberg wrote:
> > On 3 November 2014 16:47, Caitlin Potter wrote:
> >> It looks like there is machinery in `Scope` for storing internal
> variables.
> >> Coul
On 3 November 2014 16:58, Andreas Rossberg wrote:
> On 3 November 2014 16:47, Caitlin Potter wrote:
>> It looks like there is machinery in `Scope` for storing internal variables.
>> Could we not grant each tagged template a custom ID, in order for it to look
>> up the appropriate callSiteObj in s
On 3 November 2014 16:47, Caitlin Potter wrote:
> It looks like there is machinery in `Scope` for storing internal variables.
> Could we not grant each tagged template a custom ID, in order for it to look
> up the appropriate callSiteObj in scope, and store a new internal value
> there if one does
It looks like there is machinery in `Scope` for storing internal variables.
Could we not grant each tagged template a custom ID, in order for it to
look up the appropriate callSiteObj in scope, and store a new internal
value there if one does not already exist?
--
--
v8-users mailing list
v8-
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 2:12 AM, 'Erik Arvidsson' via v8-users <
v8-users@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> FWIW, Chakra is implementing this too:
> https://status.modern.ie/templatestringses6?term=template%20strings
>
> My main concern is the tagged template. We clearly do not want to ship
> this without
Oh my god, did I really link to the wrong CL in that link... the text is
right but the URL is wrong!
Should be https://codereview.chromium.org/663683006/
On Saturday, 1 November 2014 02:59:14 UTC-4, Caitlin Potter wrote:
>
>
> *Design Doc / Patch*
>
> https://codereview.chromium.org/663683006/ <
FWIW, Chakra is implementing this too:
https://status.modern.ie/templatestringses6?term=template%20strings
My main concern is the tagged template. We clearly do not want to ship this
without doing the caching which is required to get the correct semantics.
The spec is underspecified how this is su
On Saturday, 1 November 2014 02:59:14 UTC-4, Caitlin Potter wrote:
>
> There are no other implementations currently. There is not currently a bug
> to implement on SpiderMonkey, nor JSC.
>
>
This was copy-pasted from my previous intent-to-implement thread, ignore
this =)
--
--
v8-users mailin
16 matches
Mail list logo
