Hello everyone,
I add the OpenGL (gl.vapi and glu.vapi) and gtkglext (gtkglext-1.0.vapi)
bindings!!!
There are all the consts, functions, enums, objects, etc.. But I need
testers for this bindings because maybe there is typing errors.
Compile the sample code in this mail with:
valac prueba.vala
2008/6/21 Кутейников Дмитрий <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Vala is a good language, but it pushes you to use object oriented
> programming.
> I would like to have a chance to define something like C procedures, without
> any
> classes. Is it possible?
Something like this is a perfectly valid Vala program
Vala is a good language, but it pushes you to use object oriented
programming.
I would like to have a chance to define something like C procedures, without
any
classes. Is it possible?
___
Vala-list mailing list
Vala-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/m
I remember now, it was lack of unions that made it impossible to do a pure vala
solution.
sam
-Original Message-
From: Sam Liddicott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 21 June 2008 15:29
To: vala-list@gnome.org
Subject: [Vala] widget bindings take 2
My widget bindings project is to have a declar
My widget bindings project is to have a declaration for each widget as
part of a vala class, so that the author doesn't have to write
this.xml.get_widget("dialer-entry"); all over the place, but definitions
for each widget are generated and linked automatically;
e.g.
myform.widgets.inputbox
i
Thats what comes of rushing to post before lunch;
ignore that one, (although the principle remains)
Sorry guys.
Sam
Sam Liddicott wrote:
This first-cut xslt will convert a glade file to a private.h file
which defines a struct to hold each widget, as well as named index of
each widget into th
This first-cut xslt will convert a glade file to a private.h file which
defines a struct to hold each widget, as well as named index of each
widget into that struct, with a view to automatic widget binding when
the glade is loaded.
It also C-quotes the xml too.
Vala might include the header f
