On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 21:03 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 02:59 -0500, Yu Feng wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 18:26 -0500, Yu Feng wrote:
> > > When the collections in Gee are holding strong references, it is
> > > difficult to obtain a weak reference to the elements in the
Dear Jurg and others,
I have an idea about chaining up constructors to share with you.
Situation
We have 2 different constructors, the construction block(CB), and the
construct function(CF).
for GType based classes, CB doesn't work, chaining up CF works.
for GObject based classes, CB wo
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 21:03 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 02:59 -0500, Yu Feng wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 18:26 -0500, Yu Feng wrote:
> > > When the collections in Gee are holding strong references, it is
> > > difficult to obtain a weak reference to the elements in the
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 02:59 -0500, Yu Feng wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 18:26 -0500, Yu Feng wrote:
> > When the collections in Gee are holding strong references, it is
> > difficult to obtain a weak reference to the elements in the container.
> >
> > The situation is:
> >
> > class Node {
> >
I cleaned up the comparison functions a bit after playing with Vala
pointers and begging on IRC.
best
Dan
___
Daniel Lucraft
http://www.daniellucraft.com/
2008/11/21 Daniel Lucraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> As requested on IRC, here are two patches that add a sort method to
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 13:45 +, Karl Lattimer wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 14:30 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 13:20 +, Karl Lattimer wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 14:11 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 12:46 +, Karl Lattimer wrote:
As requested on IRC, here are two patches that add a sort method to ArrayList.
Some notes:
1. I wasn't sure where to put the vapi binding to the C stdlib
function qsort. But I saw that
glib.vapi had the reference to the strcmp function so I put it next to that.
2. There are two comparison fu
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 14:30 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 13:20 +, Karl Lattimer wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 14:11 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 12:46 +, Karl Lattimer wrote:
> > > > After overcoming my previous issues I'm now running int
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 13:20 +, Karl Lattimer wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 14:11 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 12:46 +, Karl Lattimer wrote:
> > > After overcoming my previous issues I'm now running into some other
> > > problems.
> > >
> > > Again any help much ap
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 14:11 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 12:46 +, Karl Lattimer wrote:
> > After overcoming my previous issues I'm now running into some other
> > problems.
> >
> > Again any help much appreciated.
>
> This looks like a vala-independent libtool issue. Po
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 12:46 +, Karl Lattimer wrote:
> After overcoming my previous issues I'm now running into some other
> problems.
>
> Again any help much appreciated.
This looks like a vala-independent libtool issue. Possibly using libtool
2 without clean autogen? Can you try again after
After overcoming my previous issues I'm now running into some other
problems.
Again any help much appreciated.
/bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I.. -I..-I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include
-I/usr/include/gio-unix-2.0/ -I/usr/include/uuid
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 13:03 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 11:47 +, Karl Lattimer wrote:
> > I've just upgraded to vala 0.5 and when I attempt to build something I
> > get a large stream of gobject errors which look a bit overly verbose?
> >
> > Here's a dump of them...
>
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 11:47 +, Karl Lattimer wrote:
> I've just upgraded to vala 0.5 and when I attempt to build something I
> get a large stream of gobject errors which look a bit overly verbose?
>
> Here's a dump of them...
>
> Any ideas?
I'm assuming that you're trying to build wizbit. Th
I've just upgraded to vala 0.5 and when I attempt to build something I
get a large stream of gobject errors which look a bit overly verbose?
Here's a dump of them...
Any ideas?
gobject-2.0.vapi:372.3-372.26: error: `GLib.Signal' already contains a
definition for `query'
public st
On Wednesday 12 November 2008 23:03:56 Daniele Benucci wrote:
>
> First try:
> (1)HashTable properties = server.GetProperties();
> (2)string address = properties.lookup("Address").get_string();
> Vala compilation is successful, but C compilation fails with "incompatible
> ty
Thanks for the feedback, that has fixed the problem.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Jürg Billeter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 11/21/2008 10:10 AM
To: Spencer, Matthew
Cc: vala-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Vala] Foreach on interfaces
Hi Matt,
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 09:48 +, S
Hi Matt,
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 09:48 +, Spencer, Matthew wrote:
> But I get errors:
> error: missing class prerequisite for interface 'InterfaceA'
> on the lines marked with 1 and 2.
Interfaces need to have a class as prerequisite to be usable as a
variable - we miss memory management infor
Hi All
I was surprised to find that the following does not work under vala 0.5.1
public interface InterfaceA {
public abstract void function();
}
public class Instance : InterfaceA {
public void function() {
}
}
public static main(string[] args) {
List list=new List(); // 1
list.
19 matches
Mail list logo