Hello Jürg,
* Jürg Billeter wrote on Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 01:11:55PM CEST:
> I've updated the Vala support patches initially written by Mathias
> Hasselmann to fix a few issues and to conform to the reworked header
> file generation in Vala 0.7.
Thanks for your work on this. I see your patch is
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 01:02 -0400, Yu Feng wrote:
> If a VALA package depends on the features provided in the patch, will
> the distributed tarball(make dist) be compilable on a system with a
> unpatched automake?
Source tarballs do not require automake at all (nor autoconf or libtool)
just to bui
Dear Jurg,
I have two questions:
If a VALA package depends on the features provided in the patch, will
the distributed tarball(make dist) be compilable on a system with a
unpatched automake?
Is VALA itself going to make use of the features once the they are
accepted in the automake upstream? If
I don't think VALA has a typedef.
The keyword doesn't exist in VALA's parser.
Yu
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 19:51 -0700, Charles Hixson wrote:
> Does Vala have a typedef? If so, what's its syntax.
> (Also, should this have gone to a different list?)
> ___
Depends on what you're typedef'ing unfortunetly.
One of the things I've noted that the Vala website currently lacks is a
"Using Vala with C" tutorial - based on the assumption of existing C
knowledge and that you'll be working with non-gobject libraries.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Charles
Does Vala have a typedef? If so, what's its syntax.
(Also, should this have gone to a different list?)
___
Vala-list mailing list
Vala-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
You are right, it's was a bug.
Today I updated my vala to 0.6.0 and it works now.
Leonti
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Yu Feng wrote:
> I bet it is a bug.
>
> Yu
> On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 00:14 +0200, Leonti Bielski wrote:
>> Ok, thanks for the advise then.
>>
>> Now I have different problem. I
I've updated the Vala support patches initially written by Mathias
Hasselmann to fix a few issues and to conform to the reworked header
file generation in Vala 0.7. It appears to work well with a simple test
project including correct distcheck and maintainer-clean functionality.
I didn't get around
I think I may have found a small bug in the usage of static delegates
with Vala generic types. Basically, I think Vala ought to enforce
that if I refer to the variable type in a delegate defined in a
generic, I mean the version associated with specific version of the
generic in use.
Here
