On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Mario Daniel Ruiz Saavedra <
desideran...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Unlikely. You are confusing translate with transform. Please argue
> properly.
>
He's right though -- the relationship between C and Vala is not 1:1 unless
the C code was generated by valac.
Unlikely. You are confusing translate with transform. Please argue properly.
De: Jonas Kulla
Para: Mario Daniel Ruiz Saavedra
CC: Vala List
Enviado: Jueves, 20 de septiembre, 2012 13:55:50
Asunto: Re: [Vala] Rv: C to Vala
2012/9/20 Mario Daniel Ruiz Sa
2012/9/20 Mario Daniel Ruiz Saavedra
> What hinders it from making it the other way (taking c code which heavily
> uses GLib, and turning it into Vala Code)?
>
The same thing that hinders an oven from producing flour and water from
bread I suppose.
__
Once the Vala to C rules are defined, the inverse rules should work for C to
vala, at least in a 80%
- Mensaje original -
De: Landon Blake
Para: Mario Daniel Ruiz Saavedra
CC:
Enviado: Jueves, 20 de septiembre, 2012 12:47:10
Asunto: Re: [Vala] Rv: C to Vala
It would be possible to take
valac takes Vala code, analyzes it, and generates C code accordingly. What
hinders it from making it the other way (taking c code which heavily uses GLib,
and turning it into Vala Code)? Also, whould prove correctness, as doing Vala
to C and then C to Vala should produce similar code.
- Mens
Hi,
With Vala >= 0.14.x and libsoup-2.4 there's method, which calls
'header_free_param_list()'. I wonder how I can replace this method
under Vala 0.12.x. I can't see a 'free' method for this old version of
Vala.
I can't upgrade Vala, because it's official version in FreeBSD's ports tree.
Regards
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Stefano Debenedetti
wrote:
> Please attach yours there too, it seems we tackled different parts
> of OpenSSL API so our two vapis are not overlapping and could easily
> be merged.
That's a great idea.. I'll wait 'til the end of the day, in case
someone has suggest
Hi Shawn,
your mail prompted me to post an OpenSSL vapi I did a while ago here:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684446
Please attach yours there too, it seems we tackled different parts
of OpenSSL API so our two vapis are not overlapping and could easily
be merged.
Hopefully creating
