On 04/12/2012 07:28 PM, Luca Bruno wrote:
Most physics engines out there are C++, and Vala can't handle C++ (not yet).
Hi,
I have seen the branch named wip/cpp this morning...
What do you intend to do with it ?
___
vala-list mailing list
On 04/12/2012 10:29 PM, Luca Bruno wrote:
Hi,
I have seen the branch named wip/cpp this morning...
What do you intend to do with it ?
It's not going to be merged anytime soon. It's supposed to be a basic
support for using C++ libraries.
Ok, great !
On 03/10/2012 12:08 AM, Luca Bruno wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Jacques-Pascal Deplaix
jp.depl...@gmail.com mailto:jp.depl...@gmail.com wrote:
It compile but the destructor is never called.
When is it supposed to be called ?
I've sent an email some days ago
On 03/09/2012 07:09 AM, Derek Dai wrote:
I tried the syntax too. The same issue.
But it's OK with class construct/destruct.
class MyClass : Object
{
static string message = null;
class construct
{
message = Bla;
}
class ~MyClass()
{
message = null;
}
}
Derek Dai
It compile but
On 03/08/2012 12:30 PM, Luca Bruno wrote:
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Derek Dai daide...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
In Vala, if I allocate resource in static construct block, where can I free
it? Thanks.
static ~Foo () { }
Hi,
I'm very interested about that. But when I tried that solution,
On 07/29/2011 01:33 PM, Luca Bruno wrote:
Personally, I prefer the big V with emerald color.
So do I.
The little one remind me a super hero logo.
___
vala-list mailing list
vala-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
On 07/29/2011 03:46 PM, Luca Bruno wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 03:42:33PM +0200, Jacques-Pascal Deplaix wrote:
On 07/29/2011 01:33 PM, Luca Bruno wrote:
Personally, I prefer the big V with emerald color.
So do I.
The little one remind me a super hero logo.
I meant logo #8 ;)
Oups, I
On 07/07/2011 07:58 PM, Luca Bruno wrote:
There've been a number of refactoring lately that will hopefully lead to
dropping lots of useless temporary variables. That's for the sake of C
code readability and smaller C code footprint.
Fine !
I hope it will work better and faster
On 07/06/2011 08:15 PM, pancake wrote:
The compiler can optimize this. Those temp vars are just to make the vala
compiler simpler.. It would be great if vala could do some minor optimization
steps before spitting C. But if you compile with -O2 it shouldnt be something
to worry.
Ok, fine...
this (C-like static) we should define a new keyword
like 'permanent', but
it just make things look wrong. And it's out of the design principles
of Vala.
On 06/02/11 12:19, Jacques-Pascal Deplaix wrote:
I have a question for a long time:
Why Vala don't support static keyword for a local variable
I am pleased to announce the release of ValaTerm 0.3, a lightweight
terminal emulator written in Vala.
The project is licensed under the GNU GPLv3.
== Why another terminal ? ==
First, let me explain why I wrote:
There are still a few months I was using GNOME gnome-terminal. But then
I
2e54fcd569f437b58c97ca3e0c546226aea4b8a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacques-Pascal Deplaix jp.depl...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 22:23:32 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Variable never used
---
vala/valagirparser.vala |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/vala/valagirparser.vala b/vala
On 29/04/2011 23:47, Luca Bruno wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:35:33PM +0200, Jacques-Pascal Deplaix wrote:
Hello everybody,
Vte in version= 0.26 had the function Vte.Terminal.fork_command_full.
But in the vte vapi file, this function had some arguments
non-nullable and some other arguments
2001
From: Jacques-Pascal Deplaix jp.depl...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 21:56:19 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Vte vapi: Vte.Terminal.fork_command_full some arguments can
be nullable
---
vapi/vte.vapi |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/vapi/vte.vapi b/vapi
14 matches
Mail list logo
