Hi,
It was removed when examples were converted to GTK 3 and Gnome 3 and
Gnome Panel is deprecated in Gnome 3 so it was removed. Exact message
when it happened is: "remove panel applet sample (panel applets and
especially Bonobo are deprecated)". It is still available at:
http://code.valaide.org/
Hi,
There is GDom or GXml [1] that is being worked on by Richard
Schwarting as part of Google Summer Of Code 2011. The primary reason
for existence of GDom/GXml is exactly because libxml is not convenient
to use with glib/gobject. It is coded in Vala which means and will be
extra nice to use in Va
Alternatively also "next_value" and "iterator" method works for
iterators that are null terminated.
___
vala-list mailing list
vala-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
>>> Hi, guys,
>>>
>>> I check vala 0.7.7 and libgee 0.5,
>>>
>>> it seems that tracker 0.7.x depends on these two libraries.
> I don't think it depends on the vala library, just the compiler.
>>>
>>> but there is a private copy of gee inside vala,
>>>
>>> also has a gee.h
>>>
>>> should this source
> At the end, what's going on with clutter-gtk bindings?
>
> are they included with the default vala installation?
> can I donwload them from somewhere?
>
> Thanks.
No, the bingings are not yet provided with vala.
You can download the patch from Gordon's first post and the just do
"patch -p0 < cl
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Gordon Allott
wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 11:46 +0200, Jürg Billeter wrote:
>> Thanks for the patch. As you've generated them using vapigen, would you
>> mind also adding the .gi and .metadata files?
>>
>> Jürg
>>
>
> Sure of course
>
> Gord,
>
> --
> Gordon Al
Hi,
I added libchamplain bindings to bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=598325
regards,
Tomaž
___
Vala-list mailing list
Vala-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Frederik wrote:
> bb wrote:
>> To conclude: I got running vala under 64 bit ubuntu 9.4 successfully,
>> but not under 64 bit debian lenny.
>
>> main.c:(.text+0x13e28): undefined reference to `g_set_error_literal'
>
> Seems like your version of GLib is too old:
>
>
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:51 PM, bb wrote:
> Hello,
> I actually tried to compile vala from source on lenny 64 bit and get the
> following error:
> ...
> checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
> checking for GLIB... configure: error: Package requirements
>
Hi,
In what way should remove_all work in case of removing the same items.
Currently there is an inconsistency in this behavior from remove_all
on AbstractCollection and the implementation in ArrayList.
The AbstractCollection implementation will call remove for every
element which will in case of
Hi,
In the add and insert methods of LinkedList I saw this two line:
// Adding items to the list during iterations is allowed.
//++this._stamp;
Additionally remove_at and/or remove also does not increase the stamp.
But this is the wrong way to do this! Stamp should be increased always
but the i
To create a more clear picture how the new Map interface could look
like I have created a page on the wiki:
http://live.gnome.org/Libgee/NewMapInterfaceProposal
Modify it freely with own proposal or if there are any typos (which
they probably are).
Regards, Tomaž
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Didier "Ptitjes" wrote:
> Quikee wrote:
>> I agree with the proposal but I have already tried to implement a
>> similar thing like this and every time I tried I had a problem with
>> iterators get method (I think I have reported thi
Hi,
I agree with the proposal but I have already tried to implement a
similar thing like this and every time I tried I had a problem with
iterators get method (I think I have reported this issue in bugzilla
but this might be some time ago). The first thing I would do is to
implement an quick examp
Hi again,
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Didier "Ptitjes" wrote:
> Hi Tomaž,
>
>> I still have the code of the changes (including tests) somewhere - I
>> will seek them out and merge them with the latest libgee version.
>
> I hope you mean rebase :)
Yes.. I think rebase would be a better word.
Hi,
A little more than a year ago I have made a proposal to extend LibGee
when I rewrote the tests for it, but at that time there was not much
interest in the changes. It may be good to repeat what I had in mind
at that time:
> I would also like to propose an extension to the interfaces in form o
In my opinion this sort method should be supported the array in the
same way as move() and resize() are supported and ArrayList should use
that implementation.
In this way you just sort an array like:
string[] abc = {"c", "a", "b"};
abc.sort(Glib.strcmp);
Should be easily added for someone who k
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 11:52 PM, Quikee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have extended the tests in Gee library. Now they cover all methods
> provided by the interfaces they extend so that future changes to the
> library can be done without fear to break
Hello.
I have extended the tests in Gee library. Now they cover all methods
provided by the interfaces they extend so that future changes to the
library can be done without fear to break the behavior of those
methods. The extended tests are attached to this post.
I would also like to propose an e
Great. Many thanks.
Now I managed to get my example working (without custom vapi changes)
as I have been missing Gnome.Program.Init. The example is now
available in http://live.gnome.org/Vala/PanelAppletSample.
I hope the changes you did will be merged with the upstream as a panel
without the abi
I am also trying to create an example panel applet in vala but have
not succeeded. The example looks like this:
panel.vala
using GLib;
using Panel;
public class MainApplet : GLib.Object {
public static bool panelFactory(Applet applet, string iid, pointer
userData) {
va
21 matches
Mail list logo
