Congratulations, raster!
I'll take a look.
Geovani @ Android
___
vala-list mailing list
vala-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
Guys, thanks for replies.
Calvin, I don`t intend to create whole build from sctrach. I was thinking
in a kind of frontend, easy to understand, with nice syntax, that
dispatch commands and scripts to autotools, make, cmake and all this
stabilished and reliable software. I know that doesn't need to
don't need to manually edit
the .avprj files. Just run autovala update and build your project.
Autovala will search automatically for source files, resources and more.
On 16/05/14 17:46, geovanisouz...@gmail.com wrote:
Guys, thanks for replies.
Calvin, I don`t intend to create whole
Hello Vala guys!
I would to thank you for this amazing language. I knew it yesterday, and
love it yet!
But, I noticed that have a lot of things to do, to turn it a great tool.
For example, a *new simplified build system*. Not that I don't like
Autotools and Make, but the language itself
Thank you Steve, I don't had see it.
I'll take a look.
Geovani @ Android
___
vala-list mailing list
vala-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
Hello guys,
I'm thinking about the reasons behind the pseudo constructor overload,
method naming convensions and C# entension methods.
I don't look deep in Vala compiler implementation, but can suggested
something to resolve this issue, based in what I see in generated C code: a
name binder.
G addG(G a, G b)
{
if (a is int b is int)
return (int) a + (int) b;
if (a is double b is double)
return (double) a + (double) b;
return 0;
}
int main(string[] args)
{
var result = add(2, 3);
result = add(1.2, 3.4);
print(Result: %f\n.printf(result));
Sorry for my mistake. I used the same variable result. Declaring:
var result = add(2, 3);
var result2 = add(1.2, 3.4);
Worked fine. Thank you Yannick.
But the discussion can continue.
___
vala-list mailing list
vala-list@gnome.org
Thank yout Evan, Luca and Aaron for explanation. I didn't see the archives
for the historical debates. I agree with you.
At all, with my experience with Python, the Zen says explicit is better
than implicit. The overload is a features that facilitate the programmer's
life, but not the life of
Luca, seems nice to me.
Remember me the AspectJ:
aspect VisitAspect {
void Point.acceptVisitor(Visitor v) {
v.visit(this);
}
}
But, of course, without the pointcuts and voodoo syntax
___
vala-list mailing
10 matches
Mail list logo
