On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 15:38:38 -0800, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
> I have a class that contains a field and method with the same name,
> and Valac does not like it. What is the reason? Other languages
> (C#/Java) allow it.
Pardon me. C# does NOT allow that:
test.cs(3,17): error CS0102: The type `Foo
Anatol Pomozov píše v So 04. 12. 2010 v 11:22 -0800:
> Sorry for stubbornness - I learn Vala and trying to illuminate all
> dark corners. I am looking for an example that clearly shows why we
> cannot have field/method with the same name.
>
In Vala, you can access any method as if it was a const
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Evan Nemerson wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 15:38 -0800, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a class that contains a field and method with the same name,
>> and Valac does not like it. What is the reason? Other languages
>> (C#/Java) allow it. You have to use
2010/12/3 Aleksander Wabik :
>>I have a class that contains a field and method with the same name,
>>and Valac does not like it.
>
> Generally Vala does not have any usable symbol mangling engine. It's
> good, because Vala generates a C api and you obviously don't want to
> have obfuscated symbols
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 15:38 -0800, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a class that contains a field and method with the same name,
> and Valac does not like it. What is the reason? Other languages
> (C#/Java) allow it. You have to use () for method so you know whether
> you access method or fi
One more note (sorry for flood):
>You have to use () for method so you know whether
>you access method or field.
It's not so simple, because you can assign this function as a callback
(delegate or signal) somewhere:
object1.delegate_instance = object2.stop;
object1.signal_instance.connect(object
>I have a class that contains a field and method with the same name,
>and Valac does not like it.
Generally Vala does not have any usable symbol mangling engine. It's
good, because Vala generates a C api and you obviously don't want to
have obfuscated symbols there (the way that C++ does it is jus
Hi,
I have a class that contains a field and method with the same name,
and Valac does not like it. What is the reason? Other languages
(C#/Java) allow it. You have to use () for method so you know whether
you access method or field.
public class Foo {
public boolean stop = true;
public bool
