Hi:
How can I connect to a detailed signal, eg: 'changed::x' as you can see in
the GSettings Devhelp code:
-sample---
The changed signal
void user_function (GSettings *settings, gchar *key, gpointer user_data)
: Run Last / Has Details
The changed signal is emitted
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 04:23:31AM -0400, Nate Stedman wrote:
On this subject, is it possible to use a detailed name that is not a string
literal? I would like to pass a function an object and a property to set the
handler on, like this:
obj.notify[prop].connect(notify);
When compiling
On this subject, is it possible to use a detailed name that is not a string
literal? I would like to pass a function an object and a property to set the
handler on, like this:
obj.notify[prop].connect(notify);
When compiling (with 0.9.1):
** (valac:5928): CRITICAL **: vala_string_literal_eval:
I notice that the release notes for 0.3.4 said support was added for
detailed signals [1]. What's the syntax for it? Super-obvious
attempts at using them didn't work.
[1] You know, a signal like changed::foobar
-mt
___
vala-list mailing list
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 09:55:36PM -0400, Michael Terry wrote:
I notice that the release notes for 0.3.4 said support was added for
detailed signals [1]. What's the syntax for it? Super-obvious
attempts at using them didn't work.
[1] You know, a signal like changed::foobar
