On 21 June 2010 01:57, Frederik scumm_fr...@gmx.net wrote:
GLib/GObject 2.26 will add property binding [1]. The straightforward way to
support this in Vala would be:
Object.bind_property (foo, x, bar, y);
Object.bind_property (foo, x, bar, y, BindingFlags.BIDIRECTIONAL);
Would
Am 21.06.2010 09:29, Fredderic Unpenstein wrote:
On 21 June 2010 01:57, Frederik scumm_fr...@gmx.net wrote:
GLib/GObject 2.26 will add property binding [1]. The straightforward way to
support this in Vala would be:
Object.bind_property (foo, x, bar, y);
Object.bind_property (foo, x, bar, y,
Am 21.06.2010 05:51, Matias De la Puente wrote:
This stuff is great! very helpful for my project :)
My suggestions:
public class foo : Object
{
public int x { set; get; }
public int y { set; get; }
}
public class bar : Object
{
private Foo foo = new Foo ();
Hi,
On Sun, 2010-06-20 at 17:57 +0200, Frederik wrote:
GLib/GObject 2.26 will add property binding [1]. The straightforward way to
support this in Vala would be:
Object.bind_property (foo, x, bar, y);
Object.bind_property (foo, x, bar, y, BindingFlags.BIDIRECTIONAL);
However, this is
Hi,
GLib/GObject 2.26 will add property binding [1]. The straightforward way to
support this in Vala would be:
Object.bind_property (foo, x, bar, y);
Object.bind_property (foo, x, bar, y, BindingFlags.BIDIRECTIONAL);
However, this is not very type-safe. Would direct language support be
Hello,
Am Sonntag, den 20.06.2010, 17:57 +0200 schrieb Frederik:
foo.x + bar.y; // default
foo.x + bar.y; // bidirectional
I'd suggest ~ or -, because a change of a 'implies' a value change of
b:
foo.x ~ bar.y; // default
foo.x ~ bar.y; // bidirectional
-
This stuff is great! very helpful for my project :)
My suggestions:
public class foo : Object
{
public int x { set; get; }
public int y { set; get; }
}
public class bar : Object
{
private Foo foo = new Foo ();
//One possibility
public int x {
