Thanks for your reply! I will test it and then file a bug.
Regards
Jörn
Am Mittwoch, den 30.09.2009, 06:12 +0200 schrieb Jan Hudec:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 09:16:24 +0200, JM wrote:
> > I need some help with the binding for TreeViewRowSeparatorFunc.
> > Something is wrong here.
> > If I use
> >
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 23:30:27 +0200, JM wrote:
> Nobody?
I think you choose too incospicious (and incorrect, for that matter -- void
* is just fine) subject for a bug.
--
Jan 'Bulb' Hudec
___
Vala-li
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 09:16:24 +0200, JM wrote:
> I need some help with the binding for TreeViewRowSeparatorFunc.
> Something is wrong here.
> If I use
>
> this.set_row_separator_func(separator_func, null, destrnot);
I think there are two parameters too many.
It looks like a problem in the .
Nobody?
Am Dienstag, den 29.09.2009, 09:16 +0200 schrieb JM:
> Hello
>
> I need some help with the binding for TreeViewRowSeparatorFunc.
> Something is wrong here.
> If I use
>
> this.set_row_separator_func(separator_func, null, destrnot);
>
> in my TreeView widget together with
>
>
Hello
I need some help with the binding for TreeViewRowSeparatorFunc.
Something is wrong here.
If I use
this.set_row_separator_func(separator_func, null, destrnot);
in my TreeView widget together with
public static void destrnot() {
return; //just for testing
}
priv
