On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 00:56 +, Al Thomas wrote:
> > From: Evan Nemerson
>
> > Sent: Sunday, 22 November 2015, 3:54
> > Subject: Re: [Vala] Issues will vala and pulse vapi
> >
> > On Sat, 2015-11-21 at 20:48 -0600, Aaron Paden wrote:
> > > Righ
> From: Evan Nemerson
> Sent: Sunday, 22 November 2015, 3:54
> Subject: Re: [Vala] Issues will vala and pulse vapi
>
> On Sat, 2015-11-21 at 20:48 -0600, Aaron Paden wrote:
>> Right, the code compiles, but the linker fails because of the
>> unresolved symbols. I
> From: Aaron Paden
> Sent: Sunday, 22 November 2015, 2:48
> Subject: Re: [Vala] Issues will vala and pulse vapi
>> From an object oriented design point of view your SinkSoureList
>> class is doing too much. Initialisation should be done elsewhere
>> and I
On Sat, 2015-11-21 at 23:37 -0600, Aaron Paden wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Evan Nemerson > wrote:
> > On Sat, 2015-11-21 at 22:45 -0600, Aaron Paden wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Evan Nemerson > > com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > That's not quite right; the VAPI s
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Evan Nemerson wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-11-21 at 22:45 -0600, Aaron Paden wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Evan Nemerson
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > That's not quite right; the VAPI shouldn't indicate that a *type*
>> > is
>> > "unmanaged"… it's up to your code to
On Sat, 2015-11-21 at 22:45 -0600, Aaron Paden wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Evan Nemerson
> wrote:
> >
> > That's not quite right; the VAPI shouldn't indicate that a *type*
> > is
> > "unmanaged"… it's up to your code to indicate whether an instance
> > is
> > unowned. However, the
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Evan Nemerson wrote:
>
> That's not quite right; the VAPI shouldn't indicate that a *type* is
> "unmanaged"… it's up to your code to indicate whether an instance is
> unowned. However, the question is really what the proper way to
> destroy an instance is.
>
> In
On Sat, 2015-11-21 at 20:48 -0600, Aaron Paden wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Al Thomas
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > This looks complex so I can only give a few pointers.
> >
> > Does the code actually compile or are you getting an error about an
> > unresolved symbol?
>
> Right, the code c
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Al Thomas wrote:
>
>
> This looks complex so I can only give a few pointers.
>
> Does the code actually compile or are you getting an error about an
> unresolved symbol?
Right, the code compiles, but the linker fails because of the
unresolved symbols. I didn't thi
> From: Aaron Paden
> Sent: Saturday, 21 November 2015, 0:17
> Subject: [Vala] Issues will vala and pulse vapi
>
> So I was asking around IRC (both channels) about why a personal
> project[1] I was working on was generating a non-existent
> pulse_audio_source_info_destr
So I was asking around IRC (both channels) about why a personal
project[1] I was working on was generating a non-existent
pulse_audio_source_info_destroy, and it looks like the vapi file is
possibly the issue. I'm not that familiar with either vala or pulse,
so possibly I'm just doing something rea
11 matches
Mail list logo
