On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 15:32:07 -0800, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
I am sure using [CCode] is ok for libraries as well if cprefix value
does not change very often.
The reason to try to avoid [CCode] for libraries is that users of the library
will expect the code to follow some naming convention,
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 13:46:47 -0800, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
Hi,
I have a simple Vala program
public struct Struct { string name; }
public enum Type { STRUCT }
[...]
The problem here a name clash in generated Vala code - TYPE_STRUCT
both generated as type of Struct
#define
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Jan Hudec b...@ucw.cz wrote:
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 13:46:47 -0800, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
Hi,
I have a simple Vala program
public struct Struct { string name; }
public enum Type { STRUCT }
[...]
The problem here a name clash in generated Vala code -
There is a little information in the developer-documentation section
which is aimed at people hacking on the language itself
http://live.gnome.org/Vala/CodeAttributes
--
Sent from my Amiga
___
vala-list mailing list
vala-list@gnome.org
Hi,
I have a simple Vala program
public struct Struct { string name; }
public enum Type { STRUCT }
It looks fine, but if you try to compile it fails with following error:
$ CC=clang valac a.vala
Hi,
this sort of problems existed for ever in vala, another example:
// cut here
class Test
{
int one_method()
{
return 0;
}
}
class TestOne
{
int method()
{
return 1;
}
}
// cut here
My way of
