On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 11:42:01 -0500, Mr. Maxwell . wrote:
> > > One more thing, a lot of the functions return C style strings, (char *)
> > > are
> > > they the same as vala strings? (so I can replace char * with string?)
> >
> > Yes, "string" in vala corresponds to "char *" in C. You will jus
> > One more thing, a lot of the functions return C style strings, (char *) are
> > they the same as vala strings? (so I can replace char * with string?)
>
> Yes, "string" in vala corresponds to "char *" in C. You will just have to
> find out which strings you have to free and which not and mark
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 18:11:59 -0500, Mr. Maxwell . wrote:
> ID3Lib defines numerous enums. Here's an example
>
> typedef enum _ID3_TextEnc ID3_TextEnc; enum _ID3_TextEnc
> {
> ID3TE_NONE = -1,
> ID3TE_ISO8859_1,
> ID3TE_UTF16,
> ID3TE_UTF16BE,
> ID3TE_UTF8,
> ID3TE_NUMENCODINGS,
>
ID3Lib defines numerous enums. Here's an example
typedef enum _ID3_TextEnc ID3_TextEnc; enum _ID3_TextEnc
{
ID3TE_NONE = -1,
ID3TE_ISO8859_1,
ID3TE_UTF16,
ID3TE_UTF16BE,
ID3TE_UTF8,
ID3TE_NUMENCODINGS,
ID3TE_ASCII = ID3TE_ISO8859_1,
ID3TE_UNICODE = ID3TE_UTF16
};
I'm no
Jan Hudec wrote:
> What you describe is the meaning of struct. Structs are always allocated
> statically and always passed by value (unless ref modifier is used, of
> course).
>
> Passing by reference is indicated by declaring as 'class'. Classes are
> supposed to support reference-counting, but i
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 15:46:34 -0400, Michael B. Trausch wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 15:41 -0400, Michael B. Trausch wrote:
> > Did the meaning of [SimpleType] change somewhere? I thought it meant
> > "pass by value".
>
> And pardon me, I'm not thinking very clearly. That sounds wrong.
>
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 15:41 -0400, Michael B. Trausch wrote:
> The bug is "memset code generation is incorrect", so I'm not sure how
> you can say "Vala should not generate invalid code, but this bug is
> indeed invalid". The bug is that the code generation is incorrect.
>
> Whether or not the bi
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 15:46 -0400, Michael B. Trausch wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 15:41 -0400, Michael B. Trausch wrote:
> > Did the meaning of [SimpleType] change somewhere? I thought it meant
> > "pass by value".
>
> And pardon me, I'm not thinking very clearly. That sounds wrong.
>
> My
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 15:41 -0400, Michael B. Trausch wrote:
> Did the meaning of [SimpleType] change somewhere? I thought it meant
> "pass by value".
And pardon me, I'm not thinking very clearly. That sounds wrong.
My thought was that a SimpleType could be allocated statically, and
passing it
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 21:34 +0200, Jan Hudec wrote:
> [...]
> > However, there is one small problem: You can *not* use the structure as
> > a [SimpleType], due to a bug in Vala (see bug 588280). If you attempt
>
> Why do you think it is a [SimpleType]. SimpleTypes are only the built-in
> non-str
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:33:22 -0400, Michael B. Trausch wrote:
> Mr. Maxwell, sorry for the dupe. Forgot to cc the list.
>
> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 17:14 -0500, Mr. Maxwell . wrote:
> > What do I do with the typedef struct declarations? This is what I have
> > but I don't think it's right.
> >
Mr. Maxwell, sorry for the dupe. Forgot to cc the list.
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 17:14 -0500, Mr. Maxwell . wrote:
> What do I do with the typedef struct declarations? This is what I have
> but I don't think it's right.
>
> c code
> typedef struct { char _dummy; } ID3Tag;
>
> vala code
> [CC
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 17:14:38 -0500, Mr. Maxwell . wrote:
>
> What do I do with the typedef struct declarations? This is what I have but I
> don't think it's right.
>
> c code
> typedef struct { char _dummy; } ID3Tag;
They would have done better if they had
typedef struct _ID3Tag ID3Tag
:14:24 -0300
Subject: Re: [Vala] using a non-glib C library in vala
From: mfpuente...@gmail.com
To: mr_maxw...@live.com
CC: vala-list@gnome.org
if the namespace will be called Id3 you can do this
[Compact]
[CCode (cname="ID3Tag")]
public class Tag
{
[CCode (cname="ID3Tag_New&
if the namespace will be called Id3 you can do this
[Compact]
[CCode (cname="ID3Tag")]
public class Tag
{
[CCode (cname="ID3Tag_New")]
public Tag ();
[CCode (cname="ID3Tag_HasChanged")]
public bool has_changed ();
// add the others
}
I don't remeber well how to add the free function (in
I figured out ID3_C_EXPORT and CCONV, they are irrelevant for the binding. I'm
still wondering about the first highlighted line though.
> From: mr_maxw...@live.com
> To: vala-list@gnome.org
> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:03:01 -0500
> Subject: Re: [Vala] using a non-glib
and CCONV?
> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:15:48 +0300
> From: arkash...@gmail.com
> To: vala-list@gnome.org
> Subject: [Vala] using a non-glib C library in vala
>
> There is some guide I have found on the internet which might help you:
> http://mike.trausch.us/blog/2009/02/18/vala-
There is some guide I have found on the internet which might help you:
http://mike.trausch.us/blog/2009/02/18/vala-bindings-for-non-gobject-type-c-libraries/
Good luck.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Jan Hudec wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, September 15, 2009 02:13, Mr. Maxwell . wrote:
> >
> >
Hello,
On Tue, September 15, 2009 02:13, Mr. Maxwell . wrote:
>
> I wish to use the id3lib (http://id3lib.sourceforge.net/) library in vala.
> The only info I could find on writing the vapi file was for glib
> libraries, could you guys help me here? I have no idea where to start.
I guess you can
I wish to use the id3lib (http://id3lib.sourceforge.net/) library in vala. The
only info I could find on writing the vapi file was for glib libraries, could
you guys help me here? I have no idea where to start.
_
Hotmail: Free, tru
20 matches
Mail list logo
