On Fri, 8 May 2009, Julian Seward wrote:
> I'm not convinced it's really possible. The basic problem is that, due
> to how the compiler generates code, the last pointer to a block can be
> overwritten at some place which is arbitrarily far away (but in the same
> procedure) from where it is ov
On Friday 08 May 2009, Theodoros V. Kalamatianos wrote:
> On Fri, 8 May 2009, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
> > This paper is related too:
> >
> >author = {Jonas Maebe and Michiel Ronsse and Koen De Bosschere},
> >title = {Precise detection of memory leaks},
> >booktitle = {Pr
