On 05/27/2011 01:22 PM, Josef Weidendorfer wrote:
> On Friday 27 May 2011, WAROQUIERS Philippe wrote:
>
>> Changing in gdbserver the two letters for callgrind is very easy at this
>> stage
>> (as nobody is yet depending on these letters, it is only in Valgrind svn
>> 3.7.0).
>>
Good.
>> But if
On Friday 27 May 2011, WAROQUIERS Philippe wrote:
> callgrind => ct (this comes from the old "calltree" callgrind name)
Yes.
However, I really dislike the old name "calltree", as the information collected
by callgrind never was a tree (and never will be), but is a call graph. That was
t
>> > > cg_annotate is the tool for cachegrind output.
>> > > The naming is a little bit unfortunate.
>> > Definitely. How about renaming cg_annotate to cachegrind_annotate?
With the introduction of the gdbserver in Valgrind (3.7.0 svn), the
'cg' prefix (for cachegrind) versus 'ct' prefix (for ca
On Wednesday, May 25, 2011, Josef Weidendorfer wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 May 2011, Florian Krohm wrote:
> > On 05/25/2011 04:06 AM, Josef Weidendorfer wrote:
> > > You need to use callgrind_annotate.
> > > cg_annotate is the tool for cachegrind output.
> > >
> > > The naming is a little bit unfortu
