There were no objections, and I have now removed user annotations from
`cg_annotate`.
Nick
On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 at 09:03, Nicholas Nethercote
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently rewrote `cg_annotate`, `cg_diff`, and `cg_merge` in Python. The
> old versions were written in Perl, Perl, and C, respectively
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 at 21:36, David Faure wrote:
>
> But then, what's the difference between `cachegrind --cache-sim=no`
> and `callgrind`?
>
> https://accu.org/journals/overload/20/111/floyd_1886/ says
> "The main differences are that Callgrind has more information about the
> callstack whilst ca
[removing valgrind-developers, since I guess I can't post there]
On lundi 3 avril 2023 11:29:25 CEST Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
> I have been using `--cache-sim=no` almost exclusively for a long time. The
> cache simulation done by Valgrind is an approximation of the memory
> hierarchy of a 2002 A
Hi,
Cachegrind has an option `--cache-sim`.
If you run with `--cache-sim=yes` (the default) it tells it Cachegrind to
do a full cache simulation with lots of events: Ir, I1mr, ILmr, Dr, D1mr,
DLmr, Dw, D1mw, DLmw.
If you run with `--cache-sim=no` then the cache simulation is disabled and
you jus
