Thanks for all the insightful comments, I actually found an existing bug
report regarding precisely the movdqa problem --
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153699 -- which I'll vote up :-)
// Christoffer
_____
CHRISTOFFER HAGLUND
Software Deve
Ok, I think I understand. This means the test application I sent in my
previous mail shows the lack of alignment-awareness rather than an
actual bug, right?
// Christoffer
tis 2010-08-10 klockan 09:33 +0100 skrev Tom Hughes:
> On 10/08/10 09:00, Christoffer Haglund wrote:
>
> &g
producible. Can anyone else
confirm this before I file a bug report?
(Also, again, I'm not too familiar with x86 assembler, the instruction
might be valid under some constraint I'm not aware of. I'm happy to
learn though. :-)
// Christoffer
tis 2010-08-10 klockan 09:14 +0200 s
e").
// Christoffer
tis 2010-08-10 klockan 09:14 +0200 skrev Bart Van Assche:
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Christoffer Haglund
> wrote:
>
> That's interesting. This what Memcheck tells me about the
> application that crashes:
>
Dynamic memory, it points to an array inside a struct allocated with
normal calloc()
tis 2010-08-10 klockan 09:14 +0200 skrev Bart Van Assche:
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Christoffer Haglund
> wrote:
>
> That's interesting. This what Memcheck t
bug in Memcheck though is if it doesn't tell you
> about such overruns.
>
> J
>
> On Monday, August 09, 2010, Christoffer Haglund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > here's a little problem that has bothered me for a few days. I'm working
> > on isolating it
nabled.
// Christoffer
_________
CHRISTOFFER HAGLUND
Software Developer, Decuma
Nuance Communications Sweden
Ole Römers väg 16
SE-223 70 Lund
+46 (0) 46 286 53 43 Office
+46 (0) 709 59 63 06 Mobile
NUANCE.COM
The exper
