On Friday, November 25, 2011, Alexander Graf wrote:
> That way I was able to at least debug my actual problem.
Good.
> It would still be nice to have a real fix at the end of the day though.
> Would you prefer me to file a bug report or is this email enough to make
> you aware of it? :)
Please
On 25.11.2011, at 10:52, Julian Seward wrote:
> On Thursday, November 24, 2011, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> agraf: 0xEB0D 0x0E4B: that is ADD.W r14, r13, r11 lsl 1 (encoding
>> T3) so looks ok let me just see if it's fixed in svn
>> nope, svn still has this bug, valgrind isn't allowing ADD.W
On Thursday, November 24, 2011, Alexander Graf wrote:
> agraf: 0xEB0D 0x0E4B: that is ADD.W r14, r13, r11 lsl 1 (encoding
> T3) so looks ok let me just see if it's fixed in svn
> nope, svn still has this bug, valgrind isn't allowing ADD.W rd,
> r13, rm, shifted
>
> I'm not that deep into valg
Hi list,
While trying to debug some gcc breakage, I stumbled over an unimplemented
opcode in 3.7.0:
==30077== Command:
/usr/lib/gcc/armv7l-suse-linux-gnueabi/4.6/../../../../armv7l-suse-linux-gnueabi/bin/as
-march=armv7-a -mfloat-abi=hard -mfpu=vfpv3-d16 -meabi=5 -o /tmp/ccP7oOkQ.o
/tmp/ccX6Y
