On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 1:29 AM, Kacper Wysocki wrote:
> Only a handful params actually need changing from site to site.
> There are a dusin params that I've neer seen anyone use to any good
> effect.. in particular, most of the ones labeled "NB: We do not know
> yet if it is a good idea to change
On 15/06/16 09:48, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> varnish-cli could be changed so that experimental params
> don't show up by default with `param.show -l`, requiring a new flag like -x
> for
> instance.
I like this idea. So we'd have
- user tunables
- expert tunables
- param.show: show user tun
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Nils Goroll wrote:
> On 15/06/16 09:48, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> > varnish-cli could be changed so that experimental params
> > don't show up by default with `param.show -l`, requiring a new flag like
> -x for
> > instance.
>
>
People tend to think the expert s
On 15/06/16 10:50, Guillaume Quintard wrote:
>
> On 15/06/16 09:48, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> > varnish-cli could be changed so that experimental params
> > don't show up by default with `param.show -l`, requiring a new flag
> like -x for
> > instance.
>
> People tend to think t
I re-read some performance concerns about the file storage and remembered
that I said I'd send a patch, probably a year ago. So here we go.
The only thing it does is exposing the madvise parameter to the user, in
practice, it helps performance for big objects and/or rotational disk when
using MADV
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Geoff Simmons wrote:
> I vote for the classification into expert- and non-expert-level params,
> and very strongly against removing any of them for no other reason than
> having fewer of them.
>
How do you feel about making a few more of them compile time optio
>> I vote for the classification into expert- and non-expert-level params,
>> and very strongly against removing any of them for no other reason than
>> having fewer of them.
>
>
> How do you feel about making a few more of them compile time options? This
> would reduce the apparent number of para