In message <20110415151551.GB4984@localhost.localdomain>, Kristian Lyngstol wri
tes:
As I mentioned on IRC, it is intentional that struct storage is
not 64-bit, there is no advantage of having storage-chunks larger than
a couple of GB and asking for it may cause the kernel to do more
than than goo
Mainly changing int/usigned to size_t/ssize_t and a bit of %u to %lu etc.
Not _too_ thoroughly tested, but it went through and the expiry didn't
blast apart any more. A quick look-through before push/commit would be
nice. (Ops, just spotted my white-space mix-up. I'll fix before push)
---
bin/varn
