Re: Doc updates on v-c.o

2019-03-14 Thread Dridi Boukelmoune
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 9:23 PM Geoffrey Simmons wrote: > > @Dridi, the sentence about Python under “for developers” in “Changes” implies > that python 2 is still an option. I assume that’s no longer correct? That > went in fairly early, before the decision about python 3 was made. Right, I did

Re: Doc updates on v-c.o

2019-03-14 Thread Geoffrey Simmons
@Dridi, the sentence about Python under “for developers” in “Changes” implies that python 2 is still an option. I assume that’s no longer correct? That went in fairly early, before the decision about python 3 was made. Thx, Geoff > On Mar 14, 2019, at 8:46 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > >> O

Re: Doc updates on v-c.o

2019-03-14 Thread Dridi Boukelmoune
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 8:31 PM Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > In message , Geoffrey Simmons > wr > ites: > > Seems like python3 fallout. should be fixed now Also https://varnish-cache.org/docs/ says: Documentation for the latest release 6.0 6.1 never made it in the docs :-/ Drid

Re: Doc updates on v-c.o

2019-03-14 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message , Geoffrey Simmons wr ites: Seems like python3 fallout. should be fixed now -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately

Doc updates on v-c.o

2019-03-14 Thread Geoffrey Simmons
I just noticed that the project docs under “trunk” in v-c.o have not been updated for several days. It would good to be able to see the current state before tomorrow’s release. Does someone how to kick the tires? (phk?) Thanks, Geoff ___ varnish-de