Re: Create worker thread failed 12 Cannot allocate memory

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This message i receive when my varnish run. I have 6 GB of RAM but when i run varnish 5 GB are free ... the 1 GB is for somethink another ...not for varnishso what can i do to tell varnish using RAM ?? You are most likely running out of address space. What

Re: Create worker thread failed 12 Cannot allocate memory

i686 GNU/Linuxi have also set the ulimit value as 50...and worker proces 2048 but still the same error ___ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc

Re: Create worker thread failed 12 Cannot allocate memory

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i686 GNU/Linuxi have also set the ulimit value as 50...and worker proces 2048 but still the same error ___ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no

Re: Create worker thread failed 12 Cannot allocate memory

ulimit -n 5 :) ___ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc

Re: Fwd: Re: Create worker thread failed 12 Cannot allocate memory

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Each worker proces has a child process unless i'm wrong ;) No. There is one parent process and one child process. The worker threads are just that - threads. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav Senior Software Developer Linpro AS - www.linpro.no

misc connection closures

Hi! As this is my first post to this list I would like to thank to all developers of this excellent software. We put our images behind varnish-1.0.4 serving ~1.5k req/sec and load is staying low which is great. Though when reaching 2k req/sec we start to encounter connection closures.

Re: misc connection closures

On 7/30/07, Janis Putrams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Though when reaching 2k req/sec we start to encounter connection closures. Connection gets closed immediately after connection is established. is there a ulimit from the Operating System? Number of open files/sockets? (As user running varnish:

Re: misc connection closures

Janis Putrams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We put our images behind varnish-1.0.4 serving ~1.5k req/sec and load is staying low which is great. Varnish 1.0.4 has numerous known bugs and shortcomings. You should seriously consider upgrading to 1.1. Though when reaching 2k req/sec we start to

Re: Configuration help

Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote: Steven Ciaburri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: See the zope-plone.vcl config which is included, and also available at http://varnish.projects.linpro.no/svn/trunk/varnish-cache/etc/zope-plone.vcl Quick question about that config file: # We only care about the

TxHeader and Varnish Identify

Is there any possibility to hide in header Varnish version ?? ___ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc

Re: TxHeader and Varnish Identify

Kamil Radziszewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is there any possibility to hide in header Varnish version ?? Varnish does not emit any headers containing version information. If you mean the Via: header, the version number it contains is the protocol version, not the software version. DES --

WARNING: storage file size reduced to.....

when i run varnish i get this messages: WARNING: storage file size reduced to 1073741824 due to system limitations WARNING: storage file size reduced to 11756049694 (80% of available disk space) NB: Limiting size to 2GB on 32 bit architecture to prevent running out of address space. Specifiy

Small varnish 1.1 test with openrealty and joomla.

I have set up varnish for a Joomla/OpenRealty site with a lot of dynamic page generation and it seems to be working fine or I have convinced myself that it is;) I'm running the same site on another machine for comparison and checking varnishstat, etc. I only had to change