"Michael S. Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think the default timeout on backends connection may be a little
> > short, though.
> I assume this is the thread_pool_timeout parameter?
No, that's how long an idle worker thread is kept alive
Dag-Erling Smørgrav a écrit :
> "Michael S. Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> I think the default timeout on backends connection may be a little
>>> short, though.
>>>
>> I assume this is the thread_pool_timeout parameter
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Augustin Amann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm thinking about the same idea of a reverse-proxy cache cluster for work.
> I think that one way of doing that is to use HaProxy (*haproxy*.1wt.eu)
> which implement such hash function. You could use it in front of
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2008-3-17 17:56, C. Handel wrote:
| On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Augustin Amann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> I'm thinking about the same idea of a reverse-proxy cache cluster
for work.
|> I think that one way of doing that is to use HaProxy
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:42 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Michael S. Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I think the default timeout on backends connection may be a little
> > > short, though.
> > I assume thi
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Mich
ael S. Fischer" writes:
>On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:42 AM, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wro=
>te:
>> "Michael S. Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > > I think the default timeout on
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Michael S. Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Dag-Erling Smørgrav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > "Michael S. Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > "Dag-Erling Smørgrav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > > I think the default tim
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?=
writes:
>> > What does the timeout pertain to? Connect time? Response time?
>> Actually, I don't think we have any non-default timeout on the
>> backends now: connect timeout is whatever the kernel uses and we don't
>> set any
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >No, we were talking about how long an idle backend connection is kept
> >open (or at least I was).
>
> Yes I know :-)
>
> And we don't do anything to close those before the backend closes on
> us, we have no reas
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Mich
ael S. Fischer" writes:
>On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> >No, we were talking about how long an idle backend connection is kept
>> >open (or at least I was).
>>
>> Yes I know :-)
>>
>> And we don't do anyth
Am Sonntag 16 März 2008 15:54:42 schrieben Sie:
> Sascha Ottolski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Now my question is: what kind of hardware would I need? Lots of RAM
> > seems to be obvious, what ever "a lot" may be...What about the disk
> > subsystem? Should I look into something like RAID-0 with
Michael,
thanks a lot for taking the time to give me such a detailed answer.
please see my replies below.
Am Sonntag 16 März 2008 18:00:42 schrieb Michael S. Fischer:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Sascha Ottolski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > The challenge is to server 20+ million image
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Sascha Ottolski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > The challenge is to server 20+ million image files, I guess with
> > > up to 1500 req/sec at peak.
> well, wo far I have analyzed the webserver logs of one week. this
> indicates that indeed there would b
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "C. Ha
ndel" writes:
>Serving static files using a http-accelerator seems odd to me.
Uhm, this is a pretty weird statement if you stop to think about it :-)
There is no way you could serve a dynamic file from an accellerator
without defining it as 'static' for a m
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 8:06 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Serving static files using a http-accelerator seems odd to me.
>
> Uhm, this is a pretty weird statement if you stop to think about it :-)
>
> There is no way you could serve a dynamic file from an accellerator
> w
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "C. H
andel" writes:
> Finally, I would advice you guys to seriously look at flash-"disk"
>> drives. The virtual elimination of seektime is just what you want
>> from a web server or cache.
>
>Having Flash Drives for 400GB of content could kill some budgets ;)
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>> One good way to do this is to put a pass-only Varnish instance (i.e.,
>> a content switch) in front of a set of intermediate backends (Varnish
>> caching proxies), each of which is assigned to cache a subset of the
>> possible URI namespace.
>>
>> However, in order to
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 3:32 PM, DHF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is called CARP/"Cache Array Routing Protocol" in squid land.
> Here's a link to some info on it:
>
> http://docs.huihoo.com/gnu_linux/squid/html/x2398.html
>
> It works quite well for reducing the number of globally duplicat
18 matches
Mail list logo
