RE: Re: Question about threads

Thanks for the tips, I will test this and come back with the result. / E Original Message --- On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:24:52 -0700 Michael S. Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 4:51 AM, Rafael Umann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If it is a 32bits

Re: Question about threads

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 1. The 32bits arch (cant open threads and the storage file is too small), so im moving into 64bits. Yes, 32bit is generally not big enough to Varnish for non-trivial workloads. 2. The cpu usage of the listener process with 2 hits/sec

Re: Little question about the releases of Varnish

* Oliver Oli | are there any debian buildpackage scripts available? Yes, you get them in the debian/ directory if you do a subversion checkout. -- Tollef Fog Heen / Linpro ASt: 21 54 41 73 UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are

Re: Question about threads

how about your storage file size? []s, On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:20:59 +0200 Erik Torlen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I still have the same problem :( The threads are created up to 238 where they are stopped, even if I set threads_max = 1000 and threads_pools = 2 (or 3). I also tested the tips

Re: Question about threads

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Erik Torlen writes: I still have the same problem :( The threads are created up to 238 where they are stopped, even if I set threads_max = 1000 and threads_pools = 2 (or 3). I also tested the tips and decreased the stack sixe to 512 and increased overflow_max to

varnish performance problem

We are testing varnish as a potential replacement for our legacy squid setup on a dual core 8GB RAM server. We've noticed that varnish performance would suddenly deteriorate after running for a while. The server load is at around 0.2 before all of a sudden it climbs to over 20 and keeps rising.