Hi,
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 10:02:52AM +1200, Darryl Dixon - Winterhouse Consulting
wrote:
Afterwards you can
vcl.discard old-unique-name
if you want to get rid of it.
It is pretty easy to automate this all with expect(1) as well, if an
'automated' reload solution is required :)
* Wichert Akkerman
| Is there any documentation on how req.grace and obj.grace are used? I
| could not find any mention of grace handling in the manpages or the wiki.
There's a commit, http://varnish.projects.linpro.no/changeset/2392
which explains a little bit about this.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
I want to deploy Varnish with very large cache sizes (200GB or more)
for large, long lived file sets. Is it more efficient to use large
swap or large mmap in this scenario?
According to the FreeBSD lists, even 20GB of swap requires 200MB of
kern.maxswzone just to keep track of it, so it
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Skye Poier Nott writes
:
I want to deploy Varnish with very large cache sizes (200GB or more)
for large, long lived file sets. Is it more efficient to use large
swap or large mmap in this scenario?
We have no real-world experience with content of that size, so
Thanks, that was my hunch. I'll let you know how it goes when I have
some performance metrics.
Skye
On 1-Jul-08, at 11:24 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Skye Poier
Nott writes
:
I want to deploy Varnish with very large cache sizes (200GB or more)
for
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Skye Poier Nott writes:
Thanks, that was my hunch. I'll let you know how it goes when I have
some performance metrics.
Input is very much appreciated.
I can also recommend setting up Munin or similar to plot all the varnishstat
and systat variables, that has
Weird, any thoughts? Or am I just asking for trouble with -trunk :)
$ svn update (last night's)
$ make clean configure make
mkdir .libs
gcc -DVARNISH_STATE_DIR=\/usr/local/var/varnish\ -g -O2 -o .libs/
varnishd varnishd-cache_acceptor.o varnishd-cache_acceptor_epoll.o
