Re: Varnish 2.01 - GETs with Grinder end up in PASS

2008-11-04 Thread JT Justman
Robert Ming wrote: Hi! We do load-testing with 'The Grinder' vers. 3.1 on Varnish in front of several Plone3 instances. The tests worked out fine with Varnish 2.0 beta. Now with version 2.01 we have the following issue: Executing any GET with the Testing-Framework results always in a PASS

caching using ETags to vary the content

2008-11-04 Thread Miles
Hi I am using varnish 2.0-beta-2. I am using varnish to cache a website where there is a small amount of personalised content in a particular directory. When the user is outside of that directory, the only difference for logged-in and non-logged-in users is a few links (e.g. login/register

varnish in front of load balancer

2008-11-04 Thread Miles
Hi, Second question - we are running varnish in front of a load balander. The load balancer has stickiness - requests go to the same backend server each time, unless that server goes down. The stickiness is provided by a cookie which is set on the first request, and then read to direct the

Re: Conditional GET (was Re: caching using ETags to vary the content)

2008-11-04 Thread Miles
Ryan Tomayko wrote: On 11/4/08 12:51 PM, Miles wrote: I know varnish doesn't do If-None-Match, but I don't think that is a problem in this scheme. I'm curious to understand why Varnish doesn't do validation / conditional GET. Has If-Modified-Since/If-None-Match support been considered and

Re: Frontend caching to multiple sites

2008-11-04 Thread Espen Braastad
Alecs Henry wrote: I want to set up varnish as a reverse proxy/cache to multiple customer sites. As in, I have 10 different customers, each with its own web site (domains) with their own necessities, compression, cookie, authentication, etc; each customer is a different setup from the other,