Hi Tollef,
I've pasted the logs of two failed requests below. As you can see,
they're both in response to POST requests, though I was overstating the
frequency at which these errors are occurring: they're occurring about
10% of the time.
To be honest, I don't entirely understand the logs or their
On Jan 29, 2010, at 3:54 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> It should be. You'll lose the last storage silo (since that's not
> closed yet), but older objects should be available.
This might be the source of the confusion. How often are silos closed? My
testing was simply "hit the cache for a single
1) 8 (All servers are serving from mem, big machines. 6 as frontend in
cluster and load balanced, 1 as between frontend varnish and backend
application server and 1 as backup)
2) ~250MB/s (through varnish). 2.5m visitors a day, 27m pageviews a day
(for the whole website, some content doesn't go thr
Hi,
I precise: I don't work for Linpro. ;)
For some big project, I'm planing to deploy Varnish.
So I would be interested if you could precise the Operating system
you're using to run Varnish and the hardware type (CPU, memory, HD,
NICs).
Does some of you run it in a virtualized environment?
(X
Hi list.
I'm working for Redpill Linpro, you might have heard of us - we're the main
sponsor of Varnish development. We're a bit curious about how Varnish is used,
what features are used and what is missing. What does a typical installation
look like? The information you would choose to reveal
]] Ken Brownfield
| Right, -spersistent. Child restarts are persistent, parent process
stop/start isn't.
It should be. You'll lose the last storage silo (since that's not
closed yet), but older objects should be available.
Can you see if you can reproduce and post a varnishlog -1 when the ch
]] Torrance
| I am running a drupal site behind Varnish and when posts or comments are
| submitted there's about a 50/50 chance the user will get one of
| Varnish's 503 error pages. These errors aren't after waiting a little
| while or even a few seconds - they are returned with no delay
| whatso
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote :
> >Let's get back to consistent hashing and it's use...
> >
> >Correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't this mean that adding a new
> >varnish instance implies a full rehash ?
>
> Yes, that is pretty much guaranteed to be the cost with any
> stateless hashing.
No, not wit
]] Abhishek Singh
| I am using varnish for static files caching and multiple domains are getting
| served from varnish cluster and i want to purge static files for specific
| domain so how can i do that.
|
| I tired following but it is not working.
|
| 1)
| purge req.http.host ~ xyz.com
| 101
]] pablort
| The numbers do reflect the TxStatus'es that I see in interactive varnishtop,
| but when I try to run it with -1, it doesn't show which entry corresponds to
| which status. LOL.
You're running an old version, this was fixed in 2.0.5 so upgrading
should fix that.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
10 matches
Mail list logo
