I thought this might be of interest:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TrafficServerProposal
- ask
___
varnish-misc mailing list
varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no
http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
On Aug 8, 2008, at 12:20, Ian M. Evans wrote:
[]
> So of course a cookie is attached to each page, image,
> javascript and CSS file.
>
> Since I assume that some of the main sites in need of Varnish would be
> the high-traffic, digg-friendly, ad-supported, Analtyics-using sites
> what's the
On Aug 8, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Ian M. Evans wrote:
> The only problem is that our cookies are set for "/" because even
> though
> this looks like a directory path:
>
> /poll/vote/173
>
> /poll is actually an extensionless PHP script and /vote/173 its
> pathinfo.
The cookies don't care how the
On Aug 7, 2008, at 6:32 AM, Damien Sarazin wrote:
> The rewriterules rules were written like this :
>
> RewriteRule ^/test.html / [R=301,L]
>
> For this rewriterule to work with Varnish you have to modify it like
> that :
>
> RewriteRules ^/test.html http://www.website.com/ [R=301,L]
It sounds
On Oct 29, 2007, at 0:42, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> Can Varnish ReProxing like perlbal? Or is there any reproxy module
>> for
>> varnish ?
>
> It would be trivial to implement in VCL, but I'm not usre I see the
> point in bothering an "expensive" backend, just to learn from it that
> a cheape
On Jul 28, 2007, at 11:24, Kamil Radziszewski wrote:
> Can somebody tell me what does the message mean:
>
>
> NoSuchBucket
> The specified bucket does not exist
That looks like an Amazon S3 error. Are you caching your S3 bucket?
- ask
--
http://develooper.com/ - http://askask.com/
_
On Jul 4, 2007, at 12:23 AM, Christoph wrote:
> I need to build a hierachical caching plattform. The Goal is, to have
> multiple frontends that will expire in sync.
[...]
> Is this possible with varnish?
I haven't tried it with varnish, but I think it should work if you
use "Expires: ..." rath
On Jul 2, 2007, at 7:26, Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) wrote:
> I never insulted any of you.
You really should go see a therapist. Just tell him or her: "People
think I'm a rude idiot - please help me."
In your weblog post you called Dag-Erling and Poul-Henning "thin-
skinned". Rather than disag
On May 11, 2007, at 1:55 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
There was also some talk at some point of adding some kind of "policy
check" functionality - the ability to perform a secondary HTTP request
from VCL code, e.g. to check a user's credentials before serving a
cached document which requires
On May 7, 2007, at 11:42 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
I usually run services like varnishd under daemontools/supervise. I
realize that varnish already have an option for running a supervisor
process, but all the same I'd like to have an option to not daemonize
so I can run varnishd "my way".
I usually run services like varnishd under daemontools/supervise. I
realize that varnish already have an option for running a supervisor
process, but all the same I'd like to have an option to not daemonize
so I can run varnishd "my way". :-)
- ask
--
http://develooper.com/ - http://
On Apr 4, 2007, at 15:08, Damien Wetzel wrote:
If you just need to handle more traffic on your server that might be
a good idea. If you want your users to have a good experience...
Well, not necessarily such a good idea then.
could detail why leting the client do the work is not a good idea
On Apr 4, 2007, at 6:51 AM, Damien Wetzel wrote:
Everyone can have its own opinion, mine is that the server side
should do a minimum of
work and let the client do it if possible ;)
Hi Damien,
If you just need to handle more traffic on your server that might be
a good idea. If you want y
On Feb 22, 2007, at 12:14 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
The concept is that hat arbitrary C-code can be inserted into VCL
programs, possibly something like:
I can't decide if I want to say "neat" or "avoid avoid avoid!".
I understand that you don't want to embed a better memory managed
(etc
On Feb 13, 2007, at 9:24, cripy wrote:
Hello, I am curious to know whether anybody has had any success
with caching files with HTTP authorization and still authorizing
correctly. I have tried to implement the following VLC:
I don't know if it can be done with VLC, but I'd like to point to
On Feb 7, 2007, at 0:01, Ingvar Hagelund wrote:
* Poul-Henning
Does anybody even read this mail-list anymore ? :-)
*hand*
Here too. :-) The changes proposed looked good, but I didn't feel
qualified to reply.
I'm not actually using Varnish yet. My favorite (upcoming) features
are
On Jan 29, 2007, at 22:16, Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
This works because what I want to cache are
the .css, .gif, .jpg, .swf, .mp3 files - since virtually all the
actual HTML is dynamically generated out of a database, simply off-
loading the delivery of other files is the key thing I want v
17 matches
Mail list logo
