On lun, 2007-07-02 at 22:42 -0700, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Jul 2, 2007, at 7:26, Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) wrote:
I never insulted any of you.
You really should go see a therapist. Just tell him or her: People
think I'm a rude idiot - please help me.
I will convey your thoughts to my
Thanks a lot. Will use this to tune Varnish better. This functionality
is not mentioned in the manual page of vcl, nor was it conveyed to me by
Dag-Erling or Poul-Henning.
On mié, 2007-07-04 at 09:37 +0530, Anup Shukla wrote:
Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) wrote:
The optimum behaviour would
and
swears may get to your inbox.)
On lun, 2007-07-02 at 07:29 +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But my data seems to contradict your assumption that my assumptions are
flawed, since for each request on my Varnish log, there's a matching
request
: no-cache in response headers?
On sáb, 2007-06-30 at 23:36 +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
[moved from -dev to -misc]
Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My site always feeds the utma and utmz (google analytics) cookies to
requests. How can I specify in the varnish
comprehensive and flexible
configuration mechanism yet to be seen on any web server or cache.
Now, instead of whining about the default, tailor Varnish to your
situation.
Thankyou!
Poul-Henning
Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The R Zone - http://rudd-o.com
