Thanks a lot. Will use this to tune Varnish better. This functionality
is not mentioned in the manual page of vcl, nor was it conveyed to me by
Dag-Erling or Poul-Henning.
On mié, 2007-07-04 at 09:37 +0530, Anup Shukla wrote:
> Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) wrote:
> > The optimum behaviour
figuration
language doesn't allow caching to be controlled based on the response
headers, only on the request ones. Squid, however, does.
On mar, 2007-07-03 at 10:12 +0530, Anup Shukla wrote:
> Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) wrote:
> > site is cached according to Varnish default policies. Y
On lun, 2007-07-02 at 22:42 -0700, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
> On Jul 2, 2007, at 7:26, Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) wrote:
>
> > I never insulted any of you.
>
> You really should go see a therapist. Just tell him or her: "People
> think I'm a rude idiot - pleas
herwise you could conceivably receive more "insults and
swears" may get to your inbox.)
On lun, 2007-07-02 at 07:29 +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> "Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > But my data seems to contradict your assumption that m
You seem to have overlooked the fact that you are not forced to
> run with the default VCL code.
>
> Varnish is on track to offer the most comprehensive and flexible
> configuration mechanism yet to be seen on any web server or cache.
>
> Now, instead of whining about the default
ng "pass" to feed data straight from
the Web server to the client without caching the data, and for some
reason my site malfunctioned (redirects didn't work, logins didn't work,
etcetera). I verified these statements using Wireshark.
On dom, 2007-07-01 at 10:53 +0200, Dag-Erling
bey Pragma: no-cache in response headers?
On sáb, 2007-06-30 at 23:36 +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> [moved from -dev to -misc]
>
> "Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > My site always feeds the utma and utmz (google analytics) cookies to
> &
x27;m happy with them being cached by Varnish 120
> > seconds).
> >
> > How can I tell Varnish that requests with a response that includes ETag
> > (a discriminant for static files) should be forcibly cached?
>
> This is basically the same issue as in your previous e
