Miles wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a site where users can log in. This sets a cookie with their
> encrypted login details, so they can be authenticated. There are a
> small number of pages which are user-specific ("change your details"
> forms, etc), and these are s
n users, and one for anonymous users. I want to
specifically avoid each user having their own version of the page stored
in the cache.
Thanks in advance for any wisdom anyone can share!
Miles
___
varnish-misc mailing list
varnish-misc@pro
n users, and one for anonymous users.
Thanks,
Miles
___
varnish-misc mailing list
varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no
http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
his might be a cause of the
problem - varnish could be serving up compressed content to clients that
are not expecting it. You need to vary on "accept-encoding" in order to
get varnish to store both representations, and be able to serve up the
right one.
Miles
___
varnish-misc mailing list
varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no
http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
s are ignored by the cache unless specified in
the vary header or special behaviour in VCL?
I'm trying to understand why we get a low level of cache hits, and want
to be certain of the facts.
Thanks,
Miles
___
varnish-misc mailing list
va
Ryan Tomayko wrote:
> On 11/4/08 12:51 PM, Miles wrote:
>> I know varnish doesn't do If-None-Match, but I don't think that is a
>> problem in this scheme.
>
> I'm curious to understand why Varnish doesn't do validation / conditional GET.
> Has
not that cover
this case.
Thanks in advance,
Miles
___
varnish-misc mailing list
varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no
http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
hen match the correct
page in the cache.
I know varnish doesn't do If-None-Match, but I don't think that is a
problem in this scheme.
I haven't attempted this yet - can anyone see any holes in it as a
method? Or does anyone else have a way of dealing with this sort of
personal
