Sorry for this *late* response.
Noticed this mail while searching the ML archive just now. I missed it. :-(
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Erik Torlen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But the loadbalancing is already implenteed. I dont see why it shouldn't be
used as loadbalancer if the functionality
But the loadbalancing is already implenteed. I dont see why it shouldn't
be used as loadbalancer if the functionality exists?
I don't want to use one place for all sessions, like a file share or
something in that direction. Im thinking about creating
a Header that is called X-Backend: (a|b|c|d).
Hi,
I got a question regarding the Directors in varnish vcl.
If user A is logging in to http://mywebsite.com and the website is using
varnish (with directors) in front of 4 backend servers.
The 4 backend servers is identical.
User A is logging in and hits server 1. He then goes to his profile
On 2008-3-28 19:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got a question regarding the Directors in varnish vcl.
If user A is logging in to http://mywebsite.com and the website is using
varnish (with directors) in front of 4 backend servers.
The 4 backend servers is identical.
User A is
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:05:23 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got a question regarding the Directors in varnish vcl.
If user A is logging in to http://mywebsite.com and the website is
using varnish (with directors) in front of 4 backend servers. The 4
backend servers is identical.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 4:58 AM, Florian Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You could store the sessions on a separate server, for instance on a
memcache or in a database
Good idea. (Though if you use memcached, you'd probably want to
periodically copy the backing store to a file to survive
