Newbie : Static content caching

2007-06-11 Thread Anup Shukla
Hello all, I have been using Varnish with its default configuration for quite sometime now. Absolutely nothing has changed except for the backed servers port number (set to 8000). Needless to say that it has been performing brilliantly and has reduced the load on our webservers considerably.

Re: Newbie : Static content caching

2007-06-11 Thread Anup Shukla
Hello all, Please accept my apologies for posting this without complete understanding about varnish. The reason for the static content not being cached was cookies. Everything is well and good after a slight tinkering of the configuration file. I, again, apologies for not being responsible

Re: Newbie : Static content caching

2007-06-11 Thread Anup Shukla
Hi Dag-Erling Smørgrav, Thank you for your response. It was the cookies. Forcing varnish to cache requests even if cookies are present does the trick. Thank you again. Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Anup Shukla [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If i request, say for example, a static jpeg, i assume that

Re: Newbie : Static content caching

2007-06-11 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Anup Shukla [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If i request, say for example, a static jpeg, i assume that the first request will be served by the webserver via varnish, and all later requests would be served by varnish, without asking for it from the webserver, that is till the object exceeds its