Re: Two New HTTP Caching Extensions

2008-04-09 Thread Michael S. Fischer
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Ricardo Newbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I should add a qualifier to my vote, that stale-while-revalidate > > generally is used to mask suboptimal backend performance and so I > > discourage it in favor of fixing the backend. > > Of course the main premise of

Re: Two New HTTP Caching Extensions

2008-04-08 Thread Ricardo Newbery
On Apr 8, 2008, at 4:26 PM, Michael S. Fischer wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Michael S. Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Ricardo Newbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > wrote: >>> +1 on stale-while-revalidate. I found this one to be real handy. >> >>

Re: Two New HTTP Caching Extensions

2008-04-08 Thread Michael S. Fischer
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Michael S. Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Ricardo Newbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 on stale-while-revalidate. I found this one to be real handy. > > Another +1 I should add a qualifier to my vote, that stale-while-r

Re: Two New HTTP Caching Extensions

2008-04-08 Thread Michael S. Fischer
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Ricardo Newbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 on stale-while-revalidate. I found this one to be real handy. Another +1 --Michael ___ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/

Re: Two New HTTP Caching Extensions

2008-04-08 Thread Ricardo Newbery
On Apr 7, 2008, at 3:18 PM, Jon Drukman wrote: > Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sam >> Quigley writ >> es: >>> ...just thought I'd point out another seemingly-nifty thing the >>> Squid >>> folks are working on: >>> >>> http://www.mnot.net/cache_channels/ >>> and >

Re: Two New HTTP Caching Extensions

2008-04-08 Thread Jon Drukman
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sam Quigley writ > es: >> ...just thought I'd point out another seemingly-nifty thing the Squid >> folks are working on: >> >> http://www.mnot.net/cache_channels/ >> and >> http://www.mnot.net/blog/2008/01/04/cache_channels > > Interesti

Re: Two New HTTP Caching Extensions

2008-01-11 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sam Quigley writ es: >...just thought I'd point out another seemingly-nifty thing the Squid >folks are working on: > >http://www.mnot.net/cache_channels/ >and >http://www.mnot.net/blog/2008/01/04/cache_channels Interesting to see what hoops they try to jump throug

Re: Two New HTTP Caching Extensions

2008-01-10 Thread Sam Quigley
...just thought I'd point out another seemingly-nifty thing the Squid folks are working on: http://www.mnot.net/cache_channels/ and http://www.mnot.net/blog/2008/01/04/cache_channels -sq ___ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no ht

Re: Two New HTTP Caching Extensions

2008-01-08 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Found these ideas very interesting, made it into Squid 2.7. Was > curious if Varnish would ever support similar functionality. > > http://www.mnot.net/blog/2007/12/12/stale Isn't it fascinating to see the Squid developers discussing this approximately 18 months a

Two New HTTP Caching Extensions

2007-12-28 Thread Paul
Found these ideas very interesting, made it into Squid 2.7. Was curious if Varnish would ever support similar functionality. http://www.mnot.net/blog/2007/12/12/stale ___ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no