"Poul-Henning Kamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You're probably running out of the 32bit counter, we need to expand
> some of those to 64 bits...
It *is* a 64-bit counter.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Senior Software Developer
Linpro AS - www.linpro.no
___
Andreas Røsdal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would expect 'Total header bytes' and 'Total header bytes' to be
> the total number of bytes sent to clients since varnishd was started?
Yes.
> Measuring these numbers at different points in time could therefore be
> used to calculate the bandwith us
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_R
=F8sdal?= writes:
>* Initial values:
>556874988 Total header bytes
>20238688347 Total body bytes
>
>* 75 minutes later:
>848969031 Total header bytes
>30800272652 Total body bytes
>
>The problem is that the correct values are 40 times la
Hi!
I have a question about measuring bandwith usage with varnishstat.
I would expect 'Total header bytes' and 'Total header bytes' to be
the total number of bytes sent to clients since varnishd was started?
Measuring these numbers at different points in time could therefore be
used to calculate
