[vbox-dev] Question about the XML configuration files

2009-03-18 Thread walt
I've been building vbox from svn for a while now, and so the XML file describing my WinXP virtual machine has gone through at least three automatic translations for version bumps. While tracking down some flakiness with networking adapters I discovered that in my one XML file there are *four* sepa

Re: [vbox-dev] For Code

2009-03-18 Thread Josh Wright
The VirtualBox site has fairly detailed build instructions for all supported platforms. http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Build_instructions ~JW 2009/3/18 Cornell Cornell : > Hi member: >     I am very exciting to find virtualbox, and I had download the code > source already. > But I  have some tro

[vbox-dev] For Code

2009-03-18 Thread Cornell Cornell
Hi member: I am very exciting to find virtualbox, and I had download the code source already. But I have some trouble to compile it with Eclipse.It tells me information like that: Build of configuration Default for project VirtualBox (Cannot run program "make": Launching failed) Ca

Re: [vbox-dev] 2.2b1 no vt-x

2009-03-18 Thread Sander van Leeuwen
Use the forum for beta feedback please. Neal Becker wrote: > Host fedora f10 x86_64. This processor has vmx, is this not sufficient to > enable VT-x? > > 00:00:04.670 HWACCM: No VT-x or AMD-V CPU extension found. Reason > VERR_VMX_MSR_LOCKED_OR_DISABLED > > processor : 1 > vendor_id : G

[vbox-dev] 2.2b1 no vt-x

2009-03-18 Thread Neal Becker
Host fedora f10 x86_64. This processor has vmx, is this not sufficient to enable VT-x? 00:00:04.670 HWACCM: No VT-x or AMD-V CPU extension found. Reason VERR_VMX_MSR_LOCKED_OR_DISABLED processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 15 model name :

Re: [vbox-dev] VirtualBox 2.2 Beta 1 released

2009-03-18 Thread Neal Becker
Fedora 10 has been out for some time now - in fact 11 is coming up on beta. How about a Fedora 10 version? ___ vbox-dev mailing list vbox-dev@virtualbox.org http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-dev

Re: [vbox-dev] VirtualBox 2.2 Beta 1 released

2009-03-18 Thread Amit Saha
2009/3/18 Frank Mehnert : > Amit, > > On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Amit Saha wrote: >> >  * Experimental support for OS X 10.6 (Snow Leopard) hosts running >> >    both the 64-bit and the 32-bit kernel >> >> Will that be OS X guests? (keeping my fingers crossed) > > No, the line states OS X 10.6 _ho

Re: [vbox-dev] VirtualBox 2.2 Beta 1 released

2009-03-18 Thread Frank Mehnert
Amit, On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Amit Saha wrote: > >  * Experimental support for OS X 10.6 (Snow Leopard) hosts running > >    both the 64-bit and the 32-bit kernel > > Will that be OS X guests? (keeping my fingers crossed) No, the line states OS X 10.6 _hosts_! Kind regards, Frank -- Dr.-In

Re: [vbox-dev] last svn (17978) debian package don't build

2009-03-18 Thread Frank Mehnert
Antonio, On Tuesday 17 March 2009, Antonio Doldo wrote: > [...] > > make: *** [binary] Error 1 > dpkg-buildpackage: failure: fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error > exit status 2 > > > Thanks to all for the support. thanks you for the report, fixed in r18047. The 2.2.0 Beta 1 has the same probl

Re: [vbox-dev] VirtualBox 2.2 Beta 1 released

2009-03-18 Thread Amit Saha
2009/3/18 Frank Mehnert : > Hi, > > please do not use this VirtualBox Beta release on production machines. > A VirtualBox Beta release should be considered a bleeding-edge release > meant for early evaluation and testing purposes. > > You can download the binaries here: > >  http://download.virtual

[vbox-dev] VirtualBox 2.2 Beta 1 released

2009-03-18 Thread Frank Mehnert
Hi, please do not use this VirtualBox Beta release on production machines. A VirtualBox Beta release should be considered a bleeding-edge release meant for early evaluation and testing purposes. You can download the binaries here: http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/2.2.0_BETA1/ See our