Re: [vchkpw] Hard Quota's in VPOPMAIL

2003-08-09 Thread Steve Schofield
10 meg is what shows up. ps - I really like FreeBSD, it forces me to really learn how stuff needs to be configured. Forces someone to the command line without a GUI. For someone with no *nix experience or background its the perfect learning OS. I've spent 8 months and still learning and having m

[vchkpw] 5.3.24 and Delivered-To header

2003-08-09 Thread Charles Sprickman
Hi all, It looks like the Delivered-To problem has returned: Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I wasn't seeing this under 5.3.21... Thanks, Charles

Re: [vchkpw] smtproutes/vpopmail question

2003-08-09 Thread dGenus Mailing List
Shane Chrisp wrote: I thought that mail3 was now going to be just a smtp gateway that did spam assassin/virus checking etc and then sent the mail onto the internal system? Mail3 will need a record of the domain in the rcpthosts file so that it knows to accept mail for the domain and then a record

RE: [vchkpw] Re: qmail system alias

2003-08-09 Thread Kenneth Ling
I have been try to create one system alias at /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-testing and content is &[EMAIL PROTECTED] assume on my vpopmail have two vitual domain they are domain1.com and domain2.com I try to send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and when check at qmailctl queue it bouncing -Original

[vchkpw] vconvert cleartext support (patch included)

2003-08-09 Thread Evren Yurtesen
Today while mingling with Brian's users we realized that vconvert doesnt convert the cleartext passwords from mysql to cdb... So I attached a patch which adds cleartext support to vconvert This patch is made from 5.3.24 version Evren --- vconvert.c.orig Fri Aug 8 17:19:21 2003 +++ vconvert.

[vchkpw] Re: qmail system alias

2003-08-09 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Kenneth, On Friday, August 8, 2003 at 3:23:33 AM you wrote (at least in part): >>> if I installed the vpopmail , is the qmail system alias still working? >> Yes. > I have been try to create one system alias at > /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-testing and content is &[EMAIL PROTECTED] > assume o

Re: [vchkpw] 5.3.24 and Delivered-To header

2003-08-09 Thread Jeff Hedlund
Charles Sprickman wrote: On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Jeff Hedlund wrote: Charles Sprickman wrote: Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I wasn't seeing this under 5.3.21... What's the problem that has returned? That line should look like: Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Makes sense to me. Isn't that the c