On Mar 3, 2005, at 7:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that if a user has a forward and a copy to self in his .qmail
file as Qmailadmin makes it, he will get no warning on 90% full and
the mail bypasses quota. It is delivered nicely in his mailbox.
I can bounce the message with CHKUSER th
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Thursday 03 March 2005 11:57 am, Dave Goodrich wrote:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi?domain0=64.119.194.44;bl0=0
Snipped from my spamassassin report. I found a message from Jeremy
Kitchen my spam folder.
Content analysis details: (5.0 points, 4.0 required)
Bill Wichers wrote:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi?domain0=64.119.194.44;bl0=0
Snipped from my spamassassin report. I found a message from Jeremy
Kitchen my spam folder.
[snip]
That's not inter7's IP, at least not the one the list comes from. My
headers from your message show inter7
All i have found, is a way to trim the bounces at certain number of
bytes. It would make much more sense to bounce only headers.
If i put the limit in bytes, say 2048, it is theoretically possible that
headers are longer than that. And if they are less, the bounce includes
an arbitrary number o
Hi,
It seems that if a user has a forward and a copy to self in his .qmail
file as Qmailadmin makes it, he will get no warning on 90% full and the
mail bypasses quota. It is delivered nicely in his mailbox.
I can bounce the message with CHKUSER though (CHKUSER_MBXQUOTA).
My vpopmail is 5.4.8
Can
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Nov 23, 2004, at 11:01 AM, David Hubbard wrote:
> > In a vpopmail 5.4.6 site with autoresponder 2.0.4,
> > the behavior we're seeing is that when a user
> > sets a vacation message, vpopmail sets up the autoresponder
> >
On Mar 3, 2005, at 2:20 PM, Dave Goodrich wrote:
I have several scripts that output data from my mail servers and I
just add a .qmail-? file to /var/qmail/alias.
I had an odd situation where this wasn't working for the output of some
cron jobs.
Instead of a .qmail-fred in ~alias, I had to put th
> How many messages come into a server for multiple recipients in the
> same domain? I guess if someone was mailing multiple people at the
> same company, it would happen. But with most mailing lists using
> custom bounce messages for each recipient, they wouldn't be affected.
>
> How about the
Alejandro Aguilar Sierra wrote:
Hello:
After years of using vpopmail I feel this question a bit stupid, but there
should be a better way to do it.
I have configured vpopmail to use only virtual accounts.
How do I do to get internal local mail in the operators accounts? Or I can
redirect those mails
On Thursday 03 March 2005 11:57 am, Dave Goodrich wrote:
> http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi?domain0=64.119.194.44;bl0=0
>
> Snipped from my spamassassin report. I found a message from Jeremy
> Kitchen my spam folder.
>
> Content analysis details: (5.0 points, 4.0 required)
>
> pts
> http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi?domain0=64.119.194.44;bl0=0
>
> Snipped from my spamassassin report. I found a message from Jeremy
> Kitchen my spam folder.
[snip]
That's not inter7's IP, at least not the one the list comes from. My
headers from your message show inter7 sent their
On Mar 3, 2005, at 8:54 AM, Nick Harring wrote:
No, it wouldn't require this. It would require that you edit the
recipient list prior to queueing. There's nothing 'ugly' that I can see
about that process.
I think Nick's method would work for those who want to block anything
that scores as spam but
Hello:
After years of using vpopmail I feel this question a bit stupid, but there
should be a better way to do it.
I have configured vpopmail to use only virtual accounts.
How do I do to get internal local mail in the operators accounts? Or I can
redirect those mails (comming usually from interna
http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi?domain0=64.119.194.44;bl0=0
Snipped from my spamassassin report. I found a message from Jeremy
Kitchen my spam folder.
Content analysis details: (5.0 points, 4.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
---
On Thursday 03 March 2005 10:54 am, Nick Harring wrote:
> I attempted to use the archive of the simscan list, and found one
> discussion which ended with the abrupt declaration from you that it
> couldn't be done. Perhaps you could point me at a thread where there's
> real discussion of this?
I wi
Dave Goodrich wrote:
Ken Jones wrote:
"Charles J. Boening" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said
I also think spamc options should be stored in the same place.
Currently the spamc options can be set on the configure line.
We thought that would be a good place since the spamc options
are site wide. I thin
> > vdelivermail would call spamc.
> > Personally, I don't think we should offer the ability to call
> > Spamassassin directly. It's just not as efficient.
> I think when people talked about calling spamassassin they
> meant calling spamc to talk to spamassassin. At least, that's
> how the deve
Hi Kristofer
I am using spamcontrol
http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/spamcontrol.html
It is ver powerfull collection patches.
It has a bounce control very customizable and work with vpopmail.
On Thursday 03 March 2005 07:58 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thi is slightly offtopic of course, bu
Ken Jones wrote:
"Charles J. Boening" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said
I also think spamc options should
be stored in the same place.
Currently the spamc options can be set on the configure line.
We thought that would be a good place since the spamc options
are site wide. I think all the user prefere
> >
> > Simscan isn't replacing qmail-smtpd, so this isn't strictly an smtp
> > limitation. Perhaps I'm just not getting it, but why wouldn't the
> > following work:
> > Email comes in for users A, B and C. A and B have an SA threshold of
5,
> > C has a threshold of 9. The message scores at 7. Dele
>> This would handle both
>> the problem of if the user wants their mail scanned and the disposition
>> of the scanned mail.
> Yep.
If using SQL settings for Spamassassin, the user could also whitelist all
senders to avoid spam processing.
>> I also think spamc options should
>> be stored in the
On Thursday 03 March 2005 08:59 am, Nick Harring wrote:
> > > > > I don't think vdelivermail or vpopmail in general should be
>
> calling
>
> > > > > spamc/spamassassin. Let that be handled elsewhere. Let's stick
>
> to
>
> > > > > delivering mail and deciding where it goes.
> > > >
> > > > Howev
> "Charles J. Boening" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said
> So let me see if I can summarize where this might be going. A lot has
> been talked about on this topic.
>
> Use the pw_uid/pw_gid to check and see if a user wants their mail
> filtered. I'd also suggest setting another bit for delivery. So we'd
> > > > I don't think vdelivermail or vpopmail in general should be
calling
> > > > spamc/spamassassin. Let that be handled elsewhere. Let's stick
to
> > > > delivering mail and deciding where it goes.
> > >
> > > However, lets remember that if spam is only scanned at the MTA
level,
> > > SpamAss
On 3/3/2005 1:58 PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
thi is slightly offtopic of course, but:
can i bounce only the headers of a rejected message? Right now
qmail+vpopmail bounces the whole thing. It seems kinda pointless to
bounce several megabytes of mail jus to say "the user ... is over quo
Hi,
thi is slightly offtopic of course, but:
can i bounce only the headers of a rejected message? Right now
qmail+vpopmail bounces the whole thing. It seems kinda pointless to
bounce several megabytes of mail jus to say "the user ... is over quota"
cheers.
Kristofer
26 matches
Mail list logo
