[vchkpw] VPOPMAIL 5.4.10 and OpenLDAP

Hi all, I have Vpopmail 5.2.1 installed already and want to upgrade to 5.4.10. But the problem arises since in 5.4.10 configuration the "--enable-default-domain" option is not supported anymore. Therefore when i add a virtual domain usinf 5.4.10 it creates an organizational unit (OU) per domain

[vchkpw] qmail install script 1.3.10

Hi, i've released a new version of my qmail installation script : http://www.linuxpourtous.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=19&Itemid=4 CHANGELOG * Versions of softwares sources updated * All messages in others languages are in lang's files not in script * Added rh4.values for Redha

[vchkpw] Encryption differences between 4.9.6 and 5.4.2

Hello!   I would gladly appreciate if anyone could tell me te differences between the encryption-methods between vpopmail 4.9.6 and 5.4.2. I have recently done and upgrade and when I'm converting the usertable I don't have the clear-text password and since the encryption-methods differ I need to

[vchkpw] --enable-md5-passwords=n

Hi,   sorry to bother what I was looking for was: --enable-md5-passwords=n.   Br Dave

[vchkpw] Authentication problem

Hi, I've set up a qmail server with vpopmail and vchkpw authentication on a Gentoo box. When I try to send mail through the smtp server from a remote host, I have to authenticate 3 times before I come through. My /var/log/messages files looks like this during the authentications: May 12 15:57:1

Re: [vchkpw] Authentication problem

your mail client is probably trying 3 different login types before it tries plain. - Original Message - From: "Nikodemus Karlsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 9:42 AM Subject: [vchkpw] Authentication problem > Hi, > I've set up a qmail server with vpopmail and v

Re: [vchkpw] VPOPMAIL 5.4.10 configuration doesn't create a single vpopmail table

of course

[vchkpw] vpopmail and vpopmaild

Hi there, I did some quick searching, but didn't come up with any decent answers... Any idea when vpopmaild might make it into a stable release? Is vpopmail 5.5.3 stable enough for production? Thanks! -- --- Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold Engine / Technology Programmer

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail and vpopmaild

I use it stably.

Re: [vchkpw] VPOPMAIL 5.4.10 configuration doesn't create a single vpopmail table

Thanks for confirming that. I was able to create a single vpopmail table running "make distclean" first. (Thanks to Tom Collins response). After that my qmailadmin stopped authenticating as well as imp, even the user was there and password was correct and all services were up. I rolled back to the

Re: [vchkpw] VPOPMAIL 5.4.10 configuration doesn't create a single vpopmail table

5.5.3 does - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 2:13 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] VPOPMAIL 5.4.10 configuration doesn't create a single vpopmail table > Thanks for confirming that. > I was able to create a single vpopmail table running "make distc

[vchkpw] smtp rcpt check

Hello Ken and other people, I wasn't writing for a long time ;) Today I tried to compile 5.4.11 version but it stucked with problem in vdelivermail in line 205 - there is a for loop but counter (i) is not initialized, so I've added int i; at the beginning of get_arguments function. Ple

RE: [vchkpw] smtp rcpt check

Sylwester S. Biernacki wrote: > Hello Ken and other people, > > However, my question is not connected with that problem. I'm looking > for implementation of qmail-smtpd with vchkpw which will check if > recipient of the message exists and if not gives 553 error (no > mailbox here by that n

Re[2]: [vchkpw] smtp rcpt check

On Thursday, May 12, 2005, 10:53:30 PM, Jason wrote: >> thanks for your quick answer :) > Have you looked at the chkuser package? > http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/ that's a good idea - I will check it. Did you test it or use it ? -- regards, Sylwester Biernacki <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [vchkpw] smtp rcpt check

Sylwester S. Biernacki wrote: On Thursday, May 12, 2005, 10:53:30 PM, Jason wrote: thanks for your quick answer :) Have you looked at the chkuser package? http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/ that's a good idea - I will check it. Did you test it or use it ? We currently use it on three

Re[2]: [vchkpw] smtp rcpt check

On Thursday, May 12, 2005, 11:31:48 PM, DAve wrote: >> that's a good idea - I will check it. >> Did you test it or use it ? >> > We currently use it on three machines and are quite happy with it. Do you use also qmail-smtpd auth module or run only pop-before-smtp built into vchkpw package ? --

Re: [vchkpw] smtp rcpt check

Sylwester S. Biernacki wrote: On Thursday, May 12, 2005, 11:31:48 PM, DAve wrote: that's a good idea - I will check it. Did you test it or use it ? We currently use it on three machines and are quite happy with it. Do you use also qmail-smtpd auth module or run only pop-before-smtp built into vch

RE: Re[2]: [vchkpw] smtp rcpt check

Sylwester S. Biernacki wrote: > On Thursday, May 12, 2005, 11:31:48 PM, DAve wrote: >>> that's a good idea - I will check it. >>> Did you test it or use it ? >>> > >> We currently use it on three machines and are quite happy with it. > > Do you use also qmail-smtpd auth module or run only pop-be

Re[4]: [vchkpw] smtp rcpt check

On Friday, May 13, 2005, 12:17:46 AM, Jason wrote: > Yes, we use both. For SMTP Auth we use the shupp large patch > (http://www.shupp.org) I've patched (most of that manually) to use both smtp-auth from elysium.pl and Chkusr and it works preety well with my two mail servers connected to nfs stor

RE: Re[4]: [vchkpw] smtp rcpt check

Sylwester S. Biernacki wrote: > On Friday, May 13, 2005, 12:17:46 AM, Jason wrote: > >> Yes, we use both. For SMTP Auth we use the shupp large patch >> (http://www.shupp.org) > > I've patched (most of that manually) to use both smtp-auth from > elysium.pl and Chkusr and it works preety well with