On Jan 21, 2009, at 6:46 AM, Matt Brookings wrote:
My question is this; would anyone ever require a quota below a
megabyte, or, would any application
ever really need to know about specific usage counts below a megabyte?
When calculating usage, I'm thinking about making the smallest
measure
Matt Brookings wrote:
> I've tagged the current CVS HEAD as version 5.4.27, a development
> release. It is available for download.
I've now compiled and installed on a 64 bit machine. This is a low usage
live server, and seems to be working. I use the CDB back end on all of my
installs. I di
i don't really see 16 exabyte mailboxes in near future. But when the
time comes for those, there should be 128bit processors and operating
systems, so replacing the 64bit unsigned int with a 128bit one at that
point should not be a too great deal. Maybe future proof by defining the
thing in one
My question is this; would anyone ever require a quota below a megabyte,
or, would any application
ever really need to know about specific usage counts below a megabyte?
Not us, however current applications assume the format is in bytes (for
example the maildirsize file) so calucalations will
I personally don't require it. It also seems to me with disk space
costing what it does, and compression being readily available (via
plugins, ZFS, or what have you) it shouldn't really be an issue.
Are there any applications that display the actual quota amount that do
NOT round to the meg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Some of you may be aware I'm working on changes and additions to the quota
system in vpopmail.
Part of the aim of the updated system is to provide future-proofing against the
problems we're
having now, where quota sizes and usage counts are overflowi
