James Cox wrote:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362 CHKUSER accepted rcpt
1719 CHKUSER rejected rcpt
1758 CHKUSER accepted sender
and... in my defines...
neither of t
On 10 Jun 2009, at 14:26, Rick Macdougall wrote:
James Cox wrote:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362 CHKUSER accepted rcpt
1719 CHKUSER rejected rcpt
1758 CHKUSER accepted
James Cox wrote:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 14:26, Rick Macdougall wrote:
James Cox wrote:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362 CHKUSER accepted rcpt
1719 CHKUSER rejected rcpt
175
I used Bill's and works fine. I do have chkuser installed on mine with smtp
auth.
Remo
On 6/10/09 9:25 AM, "Rick Macdougall" wrote:
> James Cox wrote:
>>
>> On 10 Jun 2009, at 14:26, Rick Macdougall wrote:
>>
>>> James Cox wrote:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Cox wrote:
> yeah, i saw that patch. but i am using the current version (i think?) 0.31
I'm not really sure *why* it would be happening and I don't really have a
solution
to pose to you. I just wanted you to be aware that the output you were s
Here is mine you can try to use my settings..
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -u vpopmail`
NOFILESGID=`id -g vpopmail`
MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
export QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan
export NOP0FCHECK=1
export SIMSCAN_DEBUG=0
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 2200 \
Rick Macdougall wrote:
James Cox wrote:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 14:26, Rick Macdougall wrote:
James Cox wrote:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362 CHKUSER accepted rcpt
1719 CHK
To get back on this, what info do you need to debug this behavior?
--
Kind regards,
Harm van Tilborg
http://zeroxcool.net
Harm van Tilborg wrote:
Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Harm van Tilborg wrote:
Well, I haven't checked other vpopmail binaries, sinc
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Roberto
James Cox ha scritto:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362
Roberto ha scritto:
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Roberto
James Cox ha scritto:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER r
On 10 Jun 2009, at 18:02, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Roberto ha scritto:
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Problem should be the auth patch which breaks the output.
In the past other people with other auth patches com
James Cox ha scritto:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 18:02, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Roberto ha scritto:
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Problem should be the auth patch which breaks the output.
In the past other people with
James Cox wrote:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 18:02, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Roberto ha scritto:
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Problem should be the auth patch which breaks the output.
In the past other people with othe
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:00, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
James Cox ha scritto:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 18:02, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Roberto ha scritto:
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Problem should be the auth pa
http://www.morettoni.net/qmail-rblchk.en.html
Thanks
Remo
!DSPAM:4a303c5932661592779145!
15 matches
Mail list logo
