I'm using qmailscanner with NOD32. Fast, safe, cheap.
Ciao,
Tonino
At 13/07/03 13/07/03 +0200, Bård Tommy Nilsen wrote:
Hello
Have anyone set up a mail virus checker on a
FreeBSD machine with Qmail and vpopmail ??
What did you use ??
Best Regards
Bård Tommy Nilsen
-
On Saturday 19 July 2003 12:01, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:
> >i now want to convert to domain quotas, wherein i give the domain a 'bulk'
> >quota, then the customer can allocate individual user quotas within that
> >total. but i'm a little confused about a couple of things:
> >
I already sent some
Here we're using nod32 since more than one year, with excellent results.
It's cheap and very fast.
Tonino
At 20/08/03 20/08/03 +0200, Widmer Hannes wrote:
Hello List
We are looking for a good antivirusscanner for
a qmail system with qmailscanner.
Does somebody can give me a tip for a good solut
Courier pop3d is run directly by courier, as a daemon, and (as long as I
know) cannot be run using tcpserver.
Read courier documentation.
You'll find an initial courier command file that must be run at startup time
(I have
/mypath/courier-imap-1.5.1/libexec/pop3d.rc start
as my starting
It's not question of being stupid or smart, just what you like and feel useful.
Anyway, I'm running all the qmail stuff since two years (courier a little
bit lesser) without supervise, and I never had a problem.
I've examined the supervise architecture, and I don't like it.
Unique problems on M
Shane,
I did not try the last versions of vpopmail.
It looks like function vget_real_domain does not exists
anymore.
Try commenting out these lines of code, and please let me know.
/* Check if domain
is a real domain */
/*
if
(!stralloc_0 (&domain)) die_nomem();
vget_real_domain
I thought of this initially, but then I forgot because of the general
gain this patch gives.
We could introduce a delay for each not existing user, or a limit for the
maximum number of "rcpt to". But for a massive hacker, that
could not be a problem.
I'm thinking of a more sophisticated code, bu
Just another thought.
What is done through the ckuser patch, is what all other e-mail systems
(escluding native qmail) all do usually.
So, this is a general problem for all e-mail systems.
Ciao,
Tonino
At 01/09/03 01/09/03 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just thinking out loud.
The approa
If I'm not in confusion, you could just enable (for all users) the flag
related to NORELAY, and put the line disabling this feature into the limits
file (I don't know anymore where this file is).
Ciao,
Tonino
At 04/09/03 04/09/03 +0200, Riccardo Gori wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to disable th
wn to vget_real_domain calling
ChangeLog: the vget_real_domain() function to change the domain
vpopmail.h:int vget_real_domain(char *domain, int len );
Looks like the function is gone...
Charles
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
> Shane,
>
> I did not try the last versio
At 09/09/03 09/09/03 -0700, Tom Collins wrote:
Ken Jones hasn't contributed to vpopmail and qmailadmin development since
March. We've had 12 qmailadmin releases and 7 vpopmail releases since
then. Managing the projects on SourceForge keeps everything out in the
open, and allows anyone to cont
My 2 cents.
I'm not satisfied both with the last year of Inter7 and the SF period.
I've seen a lot of changes done, but I've the strong feeling that there is
no coherence in the architecture of vpopmail, anymore.
Too much programmers at work, no analists.
No "-enable" on configuration for new
The copy indicated does not solve correctly a bug of TLS.
Check the original at www.interazioni.it/qmail.
Tonino
At 16/09/03 16/09/03 +0800, Shane Chrisp wrote:
Check out the checkusr patch.
There is a copy on http://shupp.org
Shane
>-Original Message-
>From: gabi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
This topic should have been already covered.
Please check if this "change" works for you.
Ciao,
Tonino
-
In such a case, I may suggest a very general and "to be adjiusted manually"
patch "over the patch" like this.
At 18/09/03 18/09/03 -0400, Vinnie wrote:
If I'm understanding this correctly (and definitely may not be, since I'm
just getting started messing around with TMDA), what this would do is
cause qmail-smtpd to:
1. look for an exact match of the recipient first - if an exact match is
found, hand of
Hi Vince,
it looks like I'm continuosly using the wrong call, in these patch over
patch sequences.
Probably I should have used "byte_chr" (look starting from left) instead of
"byte_rchr" (look starting from right).
Sorry.
May you please confirm me if using the "byte_chr" call solves all probl
Thanks to some warnings I received (thanks Vince), I've modified and
tested the "patch over patch" made for making chkuser work
together with TMDA, and made a final version that looks exempt from bugs
(!).
Note: The original chkuser has no problems. Problems have been found on
the extension made
Are Linux clients relaying using your SMTP box, or are they sending by
themselves?
Tonino
At 01/10/03 01/10/03 +, David Benson wrote:
Eric, thanks for the suggestion, but that was not the solution... I will be
reviewing the site you recommended to see if I can find a clue as to what
this co
on of using recordio to see what is being
sent, maybe that will turn up some clues...
On Wednesday 01 October 2003 02:31, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
> Are Linux clients relaying using your SMTP box, or are they sending by
> themselves?
>
> Tonino
>
> At 01/10/03 01/10/03 +, D
No,it works only for pop-before-SMTP.
I suggested to use it also for SMTP relay, but it wqas preferred to add a
dedicated bit for SMTP relaying.
So, you may also disable SMTP relay, but I don't know if you find the
disable_smtp line working in the last vpopmail versions. I made the patch
for ma
Devendra,
1) did you set this flag up?
2) Are you sure you are not an open relay?
Tonino
At 02/12/2003 02/12/2003 +0530, you wrote:
At 24/11/03 21:46 (), Tom Collins wrote:
On Monday, November 24, 2003, at 03:37 AM, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
No,it works only for pop-before-SMTP.
I suggested
: 41943040
disable_smtp
2. It's not a Open Relay Server. Checked with
http://members.iinet.net.au/~remmie/relay/ and with
http://spamlart.homeunix.org/
(Server referenced above is a test Server)
Devendra Singh
At 02/12/03 20:35 (), tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Devendra,
1) did you set thi
Tom,
sorry if I may be out of logic, just a fast look at the patch.
Is it correct to keep using user flags if override is off?
+if ((! (pw->pw_gid & V_OVERRIDE))
if user not overriding domain limits
+ && (vget_limits (domain, &limits) == 0)) {
+pw->pw_flags = pw->pw_gid | vlimi
rs.
Ciao,
Tonino
At 03/12/2003 03/12/2003 -0700, you wrote:
On Wednesday, December 3, 2003, at 10:05 AM, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Tom,
sorry if I may be out of logic, just a fast look at the patch.
Here's how it works.
pw_gid is the user's limits.
if the user has V_OVERRIDE s
2003 +0530, Devendra Singh wrote:
Dear Tonino / Tom,
In between the whole expert discussion the user level curious question
"BTW, where is this user's limits info stored in case of non-mysql
limits?" got lost.
Please, let us know.
Devendra Singh
At 04/12/03 14:32 (), tonix (Antonio N
n-limits", it
still allowed to relay the users. When I did use the vmoduser to set the
disable_smtp flag, it worked. But, where did the vmoduser store this flag
info. I could not locate it.
May some expert out there listening, may guide us.
Devendra Singh
At 05/12/03 13:48 (), tonix (Anton
Can you explain better what are you trying to do?
How the "patched qmail-smtpd" is run?
Have both servers the same domains declared and the same "users data base"?
Tonino
At 14/01/2004 14/01/2004 -0500, Jeff Koch wrote:
We trying to setup a Smart Host mail router but kludge the checkuser patch
At 16/01/2004 16/01/2004 -0800, Russell Mann wrote:
Thanks Rick... I'm sure that's where I'm hanging up, but there are no good
instructions on how to do this, just "This is what you should do."
You should understand the reason. As you, with vpopmail, could use MySQL,
ldap, Postgres, etc., I canno
There should be no problem, except some flags (I don't remember exactly
which) that may be missing in the 5.2 vpopmail headers.
I suggest to try, and eventually modify the code where necessary.
Write me if you have any problems.
Ciao,
Tonino
At 21/01/2004 21/01/2004 -0500, Rick Macdougall wro
How are you running qmail-smtpd?
Is bouncing enabled?
Ciao,
Tonino
At 23/01/2004 23/01/2004 -0200, Mario Junior wrote:
Hello,
I've setup a qmail+vpopmail-3.2.20+mysql with 3 virtual domains. So I applied
only the shupp and chk.user.mysql patches from the toaster page;
I 've already read in t
chkusr must be installed normally
(-r-xr-xr-x) and executed by tcpserver with -u
vpopmail-user and -g vchkpw-group parameters.
Try this way, and it should work.
Ciao,
Tonino
At 23/01/2004 23/01/2004 -0200, Mario Junior wrote:
Em Friday 23 January 2004 13:53,
tonix (Antonio Nati) escreveu:
Hello Toni
Usually, when you install an antivirus, and ask it to check incoming
messages, it modifies client setup and redirects the mail client to pop a
local port (on localhost); so the client pop the antivirus, the antivirus
pop the real mail server.
Tonino
At 10/03/2004 10/03/2004 +0800, Shane Chrisp
Is there anyone using vpopmail as backend for a dial-up authorization system?
Any tip/suggestion on which could be the easiest way to configure a RAS
server asking to a vpopmail backend?
I'm evaluating freeradius, thinking to let it use the vpopmail MySQL
tables, but I'ld like not to be tied to
You could make a modified smtpd server only for autenticated users (it's
only another "tcpserver qmail-smtpd-mod" on another address. On this
tcpserver server you'll not enable rbl checking.
In this way you achieve easily your goal and make distinct smtp server for
authorized users and inco
Charles,
this is not a chkuser limit, but a vpopmail limit. vpopmail's vauth_getpw()
does not check for the availability of the resource (that may be MySQL as
LDAP), but simply returns something like 1/0 (pointer exists, pointer does
not exist, despite of the reason why it does not exist).
You
At 12/05/2004 12/05/2004 -0600, you wrote:
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
I feel it would be nice if it could be developed another set of "robust"
vpopmail calls.
What if you had vauth_open() which you can call early in the program. If
it returns 0, you have a valid authentication conn
At 12/05/2004 12/05/2004 -0400, you wrote:
On Wed, 12 May 2004, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
> You have the same problem in vdelivermail, if MySQL is down. You see
> chkuser because it is the first filter in the chain.
Unless I'm mistaken though, in this case the mail will simply go
You may do it enabling chkuser always, deleting the lines of code checking
for that string.
We could also look for a different string or for a different file (i.e.
like .qmailenablebounce), if you tell me your need and we may change what
we want.
Tonino
P.S. I'm studying for version 2.0 of ch
At 29/04/2004 29/04/2004 -0400, you wrote:
On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 10:49, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
> You may do it enabling chkuser always, deleting the lines of code checking
> for that string.
You mean disable this code in qmail-smtpd.c ? :
if ( strstr(read_buf, &quo
Jeremy,
why does the actual suck?
It's the first time I hear that.
Tonino
At 29/04/2004 29/04/2004 -0500, you wrote:
On Thursday 29 April 2004 09:49 am, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
> P.S. I'm studying for version 2.0 of chkuser, this could be another issue.
please make it not s
I understand the problem.
Goodbye.
Tonix
At 29/04/2004 29/04/2004 -0400, you wrote:
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Jeremy,
why does the actual suck?
It's the first time I hear that.
Tonino
At 29/04/2004 29/04/2004 -0500, you wrote:
On Thursday 29 April 2004 09:49 am, tonix (Antonio Nati)
Alex,
At 27/05/2004 27/05/2004 +0200, you wrote:
..
But there is at least one problem that can be considered as bug.
if you use comments in .qmail-default like in:
#| /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox
| /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' /home/vpopmail/domains/domain.de/use
At 27/05/2004 27/05/2004 +0200, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Another question:
Does this patch look, if there is a "catch-all" for the domain?
Yes, does look for catchall, aliases, mailing lists.
Is there anything to take care of when using vpopmail with MySQL in
conjunction with t
At 27/05/2004 27/05/2004 -0500, you wrote:
On Thursday 27 May 2004 04:26 am, Tonix wrote:
*ahem*
+#include
*ahem*
If you comment out this line, you have this compilation error:
In file included from qmail-smtpd.c:45:
/vpopmail/include/vpopmail.h:133: syntax error before `*'
This is the guilty 133
At 27/05/2004 27/05/2004 -0400, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
These patches don't have any glibc stuff in them, and they do check for
catch-all aliases.
Sorry for being picky, but my patch has not internal glibc stuff inside...
Just it must call vpopmail, who has glib s
At 27/05/2004 27/05/2004 -0600, you wrote:
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
I'll ask, nextly, to join the development group and develop a robust
subset of calls solving this problem (for all, not only for chkuser).
Help on vpopmail would be welcome, at least by me, [1] but creating
another s
Is that domain unique in your system, or do you have other domains (working
fine)?
What did you change in the last times?
Install a new version of vpopmail? Change system user for that domain? Move
from cdb to MySQL?
Tonino
At 10/06/2004 10/06/2004 +0100, you wrote:
Hi
I'm having a problem with
sue
with version 5.4.1, and I am not aware that it is
Cheers
Alastair
tonix (Antonio Nati) said:
>
> Is that domain unique in your system, or do you have other
domains
> (working fine)?
>
> What did you change in the last times?
>
> Install a new version of vpopmail? Chang
At 16/06/2004 16/06/2004 +0200, you wrote:
Hello James,
Wednesday, June 16, 2004, 9:57:44 AM you wrote:
I really don't see why you would have to recompile qmail, and especially
qmail-smtpd. qmail-smtp uses an external password checker like vchkpw.
qmail-send bounces the message if it can't find a m
This is not strange, as you are disabling chkuser.
You have a misconfiguration. You must modify your qmail Makefile, and
recompile it, with the lastest vpopmail library you are using.
Tonino
At 16/06/2004 16/06/2004 -0700, you wrote:
Actually, strangely enough, this DID fix the problem so mail is
At 06/07/2004 06/07/2004 -0400, you wrote:
Hi,
I believe there was some discussion about this some time ago, but recent
events have made me think of this again...
The "standard" chkuser patch that vpopmail uses (see Bill Shupp's update
to the original: http://www.shupp.org/patches/chkuser-0.6.mysql
At 07/07/2004 07/07/2004 -0400, you wrote:
There's some larger issue here that involves a moderately loaded machine
running both mysql and qmail (and incidentally, vpopmail) having trouble
getting some sql queries out in time. The mysql people (mostly Zawodny)
don't think it's a bug/problem with m
Jeremy,
pls switch to private, as I need more info on serial mail.
Tonino
At 11/07/2004 11/07/2004 -0400, you wrote:
On Wednesday, July 07, 2004 5:32 AM, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
> I'm preparing chkuser 2.0, that will integrate all these changes, and will
> improve a lot of other
chkusr is not working because it can't read .qmail-default, so, or chkusr
is not running as vpopmail, or .qmail-default is not readable by vpopmail
users.
It means you're running qmail-smtpd on the secondary server with different
uid/gid/privileges.
Tonino
At 03/09/2004 03/09/2004 -0400, you w
Are all .qmail-default rsynced?
Has been rcpthosts amd morercpthosts copied as well?
You can out a printf - out() - at the beginning of each case, and after the
rcpthosts checking, and see what's happening.
Tonino
At 04/09/2004 04/09/2004 -0400, you wrote:
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, tonix (Antonio
chkuser 2.0 has been released.
New version is available on: http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser.
These are the most evident changes:
- new design, a lot more easy to install and update
- extended logging
- flexible and powerful tarpitting
- quota checking
At 23/09/2004 23/09/2004 -0400, you wrote:
I didn't see anything in the
docs or change logs specifically regarding the mysql connection problem
that sometimes crops up with vpopmail. Has this been addressed
?
Yes, chkuser 2.0 includes a new call, vauth_open(), that Rick Widmer told
is in vpopma
who's sending to who
a
who's sending to whom
Ciao,
Remo
- Original Message -----
From: "tonix (Antonio Nati)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 4:16 PM
Subject: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0
>
> chkuser 2.0 has been rele
chkuser 2.0.5 contained some mistakes:
an important #define was not documented
(CHKUSER_ENABLE_VGET_REAL_DOMAIN)
patch file for toaster-0.6-1 was emtpy (thanks to Roberto Heras
for warning me about this lack)
Now 2.0.6-update is online with corrections.
Tonino
---
At 13/10/2004 13/10/2004 -0500, you wrote:
as a suggestion, would it be
possible to have a definition placed into
vpopmail.h such as:
#define HAVE_VAUTH_OPEN
that way programs that link against vpopmail can support both methods
without
any user intervention, and also this way, if say perhaps th
At 12/10/2004 12/10/2004 -0700, you wrote:
On Oct 10, 2004, at 3:11 AM, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
when you compile with valias enabled, qmail and vpopmail will anyway
handle any existing .qmail-alias file.
So it may be misleading not to show them.
That's a good point. I guess I could
At 13/10/2004 13/10/2004 -0700, you wrote:
Hello all,
I am having a problem with getting the CHKUSER_STARTING_VARIABLE to work
with my system. When I use this setting when compiling qmail chkuser doesn't
work at all. However when I use the CHKUSER_ALWAYS_ON it works fine.
Did you enable bouncing f
At 13/10/2004 13/10/2004 -0700, you wrote:
Hello all,
I am having a problem with getting the CHKUSER_STARTING_VARIABLE to work
with my system. When I use this setting when compiling qmail chkuser doesn't
work at all. However when I use the CHKUSER_ALWAYS_ON it works fine.
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -
Eric,
we are waiting for the release of this feature, that should already be in CVS.
See this previous message:
Charles Sprickman wrote:
> Take a look at vpopmail CVS HEAD. What I did was add a vauth_open()
function in vmysql.c, and every other
> authentication back end that did not already have
At 14/10/2004 14/10/2004 -0500, you wrote:
Several people, myself included, are still seeing problems with MySQL
under a large useage. So far I have not been able to get to the cause of
the problem other than to convince myself I have no network or MySQL
issues. I don't know C well enough to add
At 16/10/2004 16/10/2004 +0200, you wrote:
I think the problem is, that
qmail-smtpd is called by a wrapper program
(stunnel here) and chkuser sends log-messages to stdout when called
directly (logging enabled in this example):
chkuser sends log messages using qmail routines (that should use stde
-mail headers (if
you're using autenticated smtp).
Tonino
can you understand - me ?
- Original Message -
From: "tonix (Antonio Nati)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] mail from patch
&
At 27/09/2004 27/09/2004 -0300, you wrote:
i am running simscan with vpopmail user.
I feel you should run simscan as qmaild user, as vpopmail user cannot write
in qmail spool archives.
but when i set the QMAILQUEUE to simscan i receive this message. (unable to
exec qq)
That should be the reason:
At 28/09/2004 28/09/2004 +0200, you wrote:
Simscan creates the working directory with a privilege of 700. in this way
clamd
must run with the same owner of simscan to access the msg.
They work on the same files (and only on those files), so why should they
have different users?
I feel this desig
You could try keeping commented as first line in .qmail-default the same
line usually written by qmailadmin inside .qmail-default when bouncing is
enabled.
Or you could use chkuser patch, enabling it always or adding a commented
line, containing "bounce-no-mailbox" to
.qmail-default (see
www.int
At 21/10/2004 21/10/2004 -0700, you wrote:
We could also consider just using atexit() to register functions that will
be automatically called at exit, then we don't have to worry about calling
vexit instead (which calls vclose).
Wow! In another thread I just suggested to use atexit() in vpopmail.
At 21/10/2004 21/10/2004 +0100, you wrote:
But, as we are speaking of atexit(), I'll give the good example ( :-) )
and in next 2.0.7 version I'll use it to call vclose().
As another thread is saying, qmail-smtpd also is using _exit(), so atexit()
is useless.
I'll put another solution to work. P
At 21/10/2004 21/10/2004 -0700, you wrote:
vdelivermail calls _exit() when running a command in a .qmail file (exit
codes 99, 100 and 111). It should really be calling vexit() to give the
MySQL lib a chance to close its connections.
We could also consider just using atexit() to register functio
At 22/10/2004 22/10/2004 -0400, you wrote:
On Oct 22, 2004, at 8:13 AM, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Any comment?
Tonino
Why is qMail calling _exit() and not exit()? Is there a reason it does not
want its files closed, and other stuff properly cleaned up? Or is it
because DJB is just not happy
chkuser
2.0.7, development version, is now available on the site
(www.interazioni.it/opensource).
This is an important version, because a lot of bugs have been solved and
a lot of new features have been added.
But, most of all, this is the first version caring to close all DB
connections
Alastair,
main difference between 2.0.5 and 2.0.7, speaking only about sender
checking, is related to NULL SENDER (<>), now accepted by default,
while previously it was accepted only if its IP had a corresponding DNS
name. This (default) change makes more messages accepted.
Can you check if you h
At 25/10/2004 25/10/2004 -0400, you wrote:
I feel it could be time to redesign qmail and use atexit() functions.
This could be a lengthy process. But if you are willing to undertake it,
and write the patches for it, then it is certainly worth it.
I'm willing to do it, but I've no time shortly. An
At 27/10/2004 27/10/2004 +0100, you wrote:
I've discovered the problem with
this. Using "MAIL FROM" without the colon, results in a null
sender. This bit of code in chkuser.c accepts the email address as it is
null:
...
In chkuser 2.0.5 ommiting the colon would have been picked up with a
Jeremy,
you should add also CHKUSER_ENABLE_NULL_SENDER.
When CHKUSER_SENDER_FORMAT or CHKUSER_SENDER_MX are defined,
CHKUSER_ENABLE_NULL_SENDER will exclude NULL SENDERS from those checkings.
This is the new default in the last distributions, after
CHKUSER_ENABLE_NULL_SENDER has been added:
CORRECTION TO THE PREVIOUS MESSAGE.
CHKUSER_ENABLE_NULL_SENDER is in 2.0.7.
This version may be considered stable, despite of its "devel" attribute.
On next days I'll publish a 2.0.8 "release", and update online
documentation. 2.0.8 that will probably be the definitive stable chkuser,
with the mo
At 18.34 24/11/2004, you wrote:
On Wednesday 24 November 2004 04:17 am, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
> CORRECTION TO THE PREVIOUS MESSAGE.
>
>
> CHKUSER_ENABLE_NULL_SENDER is in 2.0.7.
>
> This version may be considered stable, despite of its "devel" attribute.
I tried t
2004, you wrote:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, tonix
(Antonio Nati) wrote:
Patch is working in a production
enviromnent, but it is anyway released as "development"
version, because changes are so important that I'ld like to have a wider
testing.
As usual, please help me testing
it.
Any bug w
chkuser 2.0.8 has been released, and is available at
www.interazioni.it/opensource.
As usual, this version has been tested and is now working on my
production systems since some weeks.
This version, basically:
freeze
all important changes in 2.0.7 (closing DB connections among all)
A damned typing error in chkuser.c gives compile error when #define
CHKUSER_STARTING_VARIABLE is defined.
You may download 2.0.8a, or change, in chkuser.c, this line:
if (strùcasecmp(starting_string, "ALWAYS") == 0) {
to
if (strcasecmp(starting_string, "ALWAYS") =
Are you testing as root? If yes, it should work...
If not, you should setuid and setgid qmail-smtpd as indicated in documentation.
Tonino
At 15.43 10/12/2004, you wrote:
Hello all!
i install
netqmail-1.05
qmail-toaster-0.6-1.patch
netqmail-1.05_toaster-0.6-1_chkuser-2.0.8b.patch
and have a problemm
Hi,
watching better your post.
If you are using Shupp's toaster, you must run qmail-smtpd as vpopmail
user, not qmail (see documentation).
You may also comment CHKUSER_ENABLE_UIDGID.
Tonino
At 15.43 10/12/2004, you wrote:
Hello all!
i install
netqmail-1.05
qmail-toaster-0.6-1.patch
netqmail-1.05_
At 15.07 11/01/2005, you wrote:
Vpopmail 5.4.5, Mysql 3.23.54. Also, I'm aware of Tonix's patch to
prevent invalid users BEFORE SMTPD accepts mail. Am considering it, but
want to understand options if I'm willing to take the bandwidth hit but
not provide hints to dictionary attackers.
You may use
At 15.07 11/01/2005, you wrote:
Vpopmail 5.4.5, Mysql 3.23.54. Also, I'm aware of Tonix's patch to
prevent invalid users BEFORE SMTPD accepts mail. Am considering it, but
want to understand options if I'm willing to take the bandwidth hit but
not provide hints to dictionary attackers.
You may use
I feel these two statements are not in opposition.
chkuser checks recipients only for domains who are in virtualdomains.
When a domain is already inside virtualdomains, for a new user you may
simply add a new line with MySQL vpopmail database, and the user will be
added automatically as it is use
At 10.17 14/01/2005, you wrote:
I feel these two statements are not in opposition.
chkuser checks recipients only for domains who are in virtualdomains.
When a domain is already inside virtualdomains, for a new user you may
simply add a new line with MySQL vpopmail database, and the user will be
I can't say for the qmailrocks version, in standard chkuser 2.0.8 you
have new defines that may help you.
CHKUSER_ENABLE_ALIAS_DEFAULT Enables checking of
.qmail-alias-default files
You may try to keep your patched qmail-smtpd.c and copy newer chkuser.h,
chkuser_settings.h, chkuser.c, then chang
At 17.47 20/01/2005, you wrote:
So based on what you have said, if
chkuser relies on vpopmail commands to determine existence then my current
setup should work just fine. If chkuser directly reads the virtualdomains
file, then I will have problems.
Hi Brian,
chkuser relies on vpopmail for domains (
At 17.08 21/01/2005, you wrote:
On Thursday 20 January 2005 9:43 pm, Tom Collins wrote:
> "secnetdk" submitted the following patch on SourceForge:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?
> func=detail&atid=577800&aid=1099800&group_id=85937
>
> It adds code to delete the associated vlog entries when a
At 22.35 08/03/2005, you wrote:
Hmmm, I'm pondering this one. Still liking the idea of qmail and vpopmail
both in MySQL.
DAve
I'm thinking to this since months... Move all qmail files to MySQL/Postgres.
I'm thinking about a replicated mail system, working with more machines in
different sites.
I don't remember exactly, I studied a lot of documents and found same
tables that lead me to that decision (to have a close correspondence to
5.x.x formats).
These are all definitions within chkuser_settings.h
#define CHKUSER_NORCPT_STRING "511 sorry, no mailbox here by that name
(#5.1.1 - chku
licies (#5.7.1 - chkuser)\r\n"
#define CHKUSER_NORELAY_STRING "553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of
allowed rcpthosts (#5.5.3 - chkuser)\r\n"
I feel
#define CHKUSER_RESOURCE_STRING "430 system temporary unavailable, try
again later (#4.3.0 - chkuser)\r\n"
is p
(in settings file) to let
anyone chose own best behaviours.
Tonino
At 14.06 15/03/2005, you wrote:
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
#define CHKUSER_MBXFULL_STRING "522 sorry, recipient mailbox is full
(#5.2.2 - chkuser)\r\n"
#define CHKUSER_RCPTMX_STRING "511 sorry, can't find
At 15.31 16/03/2005, you wrote:
Good morning,
I recently installed chkuser in response to a SpamCop listing. I have a
user getting addresses rejected that we know exist. The addresses are in
valias and work fine when I send a message. The user in question is
recently getting rejections. Here is a
Sorry for the previous message, this is indented better.
At 15.31 16/03/2005, you wrote:
Good morning,
I recently installed chkuser in response to a SpamCop listing. I have a
user getting addresses rejected that we know exist. The addresses are in
valias and work fine when I send a message. The u
At 19.21 16/03/2005, you wrote:
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
At 15.31 16/03/2005, you wrote:
Good morning,
I recently installed chkuser in response to a SpamCop listing. I have a
user getting addresses rejected that we know exist. The addresses are in
valias and work fine when I send a message
101 - 200 of 309 matches
Mail list logo
