Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmaild patch

2006-06-16 Thread Rick Macdougall
Dmitriy MiksIr wrote: * check_size Syntax: check_size [EMAIL PROTECTED] requested_size[K|M] Check quota of user and of domain. If current disk usage plus requested_size more than quota, answer is -ERR, else say +OK * check_user Syntax: check_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Check exist of [EMAIL PROTECT

[vchkpw] Re: vpopmaild patch

2006-06-16 Thread Dmitriy MiksIr
* check_size Syntax: check_size [EMAIL PROTECTED] requested_size[K|M] Check quota of user and of domain. If current disk usage plus requested_size more than quota, answer is -ERR, else say +OK * check_user Syntax: check_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Check exist of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Answer is +OK, if [

[vchkpw] Re: vpopmaild patch

2006-06-14 Thread Dmitriy MiksIr
=) Yes, my english so bad, but you can look at patch for understand me =) Ok, try again. At first, patch add new command to vpopmaild: "check_user [EMAIL PROTECTED]". This command return +OK if [EMAIL PROTECTED] - valid user (or alias, or maillist etc.) and -ERR if no user found in vpopmail back

Re: [vchkpw] Re: Vpopmaild backport to 5.4.13

2006-01-12 Thread Joshua Megerman
> Joshua Megerman said the following on 12/01/2006 15:20: >> However, this morning I took another gander at it and started by >> commenting out everything that cause compile errors of vpopmaild.c >> against >> 5.4.13, and then worked (almost) everything back in. So here's my patch >> to bring vpo

[vchkpw] Re: Vpopmaild backport to 5.4.13

2006-01-12 Thread Robin Bowes
Joshua Megerman said the following on 12/01/2006 15:20: > However, this morning I took another gander at it and started by > commenting out everything that cause compile errors of vpopmaild.c against > 5.4.13, and then worked (almost) everything back in. So here's my patch > to bring vpopmaild int

[vchkpw] Re: vpopmaild

2005-11-29 Thread Robin Bowes
John Simpson said the following on 29/11/2005 01:21: > googling for "qpsmtpd vpopmaild" only brings back two archived posts > from this mailing list- and i think you wrote both of them. is there a > URL where i can look at the code? i won't be able to directly copy it > (my patch will be in C ra

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmaild

2005-11-28 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-11-28, at 0715, Robin Bowes wrote: John Simpson said the following on 27/11/2005 23:40: and a suggestion: how about adding a "exists [EMAIL PROTECTED]" command, which would check whether the address is "deliverable" (meaning it exists as a mailbox, an alias, a ".qmail- mailbox" file i

[vchkpw] Re: vpopmaild

2005-11-28 Thread Robin Bowes
John Simpson said the following on 27/11/2005 23:40: > and a suggestion: how about adding a "exists [EMAIL PROTECTED]" > command, which would check whether the address is "deliverable" > (meaning it exists as a mailbox, an alias, a ".qmail- mailbox" file in > the domain's directory, or the domain

[vchkpw] Re: vpopmaild and php

2005-11-24 Thread Robin Bowes
Robin Bowes said the following on 24/11/2005 11:06: > Ken Jones said the following on 07/11/2005 15:43: > >>Cristiano Deana wrote: >> >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>is 'vpopmaild' project still open? >>>I have seen from cvs vpopmaild.c file hasn't been modified since dec >>>2004, why? >>>And php => vpopmaild?

[vchkpw] Re: vpopmaild and php

2005-11-24 Thread Robin Bowes
Ken Jones said the following on 07/11/2005 15:43: > Cristiano Deana wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> is 'vpopmaild' project still open? >> I have seen from cvs vpopmaild.c file hasn't been modified since dec >> 2004, why? >> And php => vpopmaild? > > > Yep. It's still active. Last week I started a vpopmai